arscan

Hey, I worked there in high school as an intern! But just on the intranet, which for its time (‘96?) was really quite good.

I would think this type of behavior (ugh, or dare I say default mindset) by consumer-facing LLMs will always be desirable for ‘hard’ problems (things previously unsolved) because it’s a bit like having saftey mechanisms in place to prevent hallucinations for users incapable of verifying correctness of the output. You’ve got to do a little work to prove you understand that it’s hard but it’s still something the LLM might be able to accomplish.

I think fundamentally there is a difference in the definition of “America” at play here too.

I think his point is to do this to understand deeply what they can do, what they can’t do, and what they can almost do. And then find the highest value ‘almost’ use case and push there. Which doesn’t necessarily mean improve the llm, could be applying it in just the right way for the use case. Of course, the bitter lesson makes this hard and risky. But no more risky than investing your time in learning anything else these days.

> This isn't just a new feature — it’s a new way to build software

I imagine they smushed 2 of the most well-known AI-isms together on purpose here to troll the AI-weary. Might as well I guess, if this type of language annoys you then the whole feature probably will too.

I was very into PC gaming during this era, and ran a decently sized gaming news website, and Carmacks use of .plan as a one-to-many microblog was really a decade or two ahead of what became mainstream twitter’s primary use case. None of the games I ‘covered’ had enough .plan activity by the developers to warrant an automated script, but I remember being really impressed by the sites that did it (usually id-centric ones like blues news or stomped I think?)

Such good memories. I think my whole career has been built around chasing the feeling I had when making that gaming site.

Not a substantive comment on content but hopefully constructive feedback on presentation:

Holy moly, on mobile I was trying to read the example console screenshots/snippets and then it would just unexpectedly change. Took me a little while to figure out it’s some kind of carousel for the examples, and not more screenshots/snippets loading and pushing down content (or me going crazy). Please don’t do this on mobile sites, just let me scroll through the examples!

There’s the chance that you notice patterns emerging that become quite grating after listening to it for awhile, in the same way that LLMs tend to have subtle but eventually noticeable patterns in writing. Some people care, some don’t.

Will that be the case for the music that you are listening to that’s generated by AI, maybe? Maybe not?

By highlighting that the music predates generative AI, at least that’s something that you won’t have to think about.

At least, that’s how I read it. It’s like a ‘no artificial sweeteners’ label on a drink.

Who is going to end up capturing all this value being generated is going to be very interesting. Back in 1980, who’d have thought MS would capture the majority of the value from PCs over the next 3 decades, and not IBM?

Linus Tech Talk (LTT) did a whole series on doing this on the pool at the channel hosts’ house. Extravagant home upgrades are a frequent topic on that YouTube channel… business expense write off yada yada. My general takeaway was, yikes, all that piping and infrastructure would be a nightmare to maintain and will likely just be closed off whenever an issue comes up (or he sells). I’m no expert, but I am a home owner, and have come to form a deep appreciation for maintaining simplicity when it comes to the operation of your house.

Perhaps this is a controversial take, but I believe security runs in opposition to many other quality attributes (i.e., usability, interoperability). Not to say that there aren’t designs that could exist that are optimal for security and these other quality attributes simultaneously, but security massively reduces the potential design space to the point where there is no rule that at least one of these optimal designs must exist.

Quality is an opinionated measure of a design, which involves tradeoffs based on your goals, values, etc. Valuing security very high, even at the expense of every other aspect of quality if necessary, is completely understandable. But that’s a value that isn’t universally held.

If your point is that security should at least be considered when measuring quality these days (like, it’s a top 10 ‘ility’ at least): fair enough.

Quality is an opinion based on your perspective. The author articulates quality from their perspective, which has value, but isn’t universal.

I remember Matt’s Scripts Archive as an absolute gold mine for learning how to make web applications through example in the pre-PHP days, which was pretty challenging when all you had to work with is CGI and maybe SSI if your hosting provider was particularly advanced. It’s what got me started as a web application developer 30+ years ago. I guess I probably learned about security the hard way by following his examples. But it got me headed broadly in the right direction I think.

I remember being very proud of how I extended his forum software to support threaded messaging and pagination.

Applications like Photoshop will one day be regarded as the castles of this era. Technically impressive, but economically/politically irrelevant. While they could be reproduced at a fraction of the cost there just isn’t any point to it because there are much better ways to allocate capital.