armchairhacker

Joined 5 years ago

Karma
9,310
Submissions
2,606
Member since
Jan 9
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 19 hours ago
True.

But that’s better than social media, which substitutes human interaction with chronically online weirdos. At least AI is smart and respectful.

Comment · 19 hours ago
But where’s the line? You could say the same about the Internet (or movies or books…) It can be used badly, but also to learn and reduce mundane tasks, unlike social media (though you actually can learn from social media, asking the AI is way more effective).
Comment · 22 hours ago
Is AI a worse vice than social media?
Comment · 1 day ago
Opus 5.5 has been noticeably better than other models at coding, is Gemini’s (public) AI that close? And is it cheaper?
Comment · 1 day ago
As others point out, the anime girl must exist because otherwise the sites can’t afford to serve you, amidst a new pattern of DDoS that is attributed to AI but I see as just DDoS becoming more prevalent (remember how sites used to occasionally be taken down by DDoS? Before Cloudflare (and Anubis) they’d just have to stay offline until the DDoSers got bored of wasting money for no good reason. Today’s “scrapers” apparently have new reasons that make them never bored of wasting money, but cannot be good enough to justify the aggressiveness that makes them DDoSers).

Hence why my solution is, ironically, micropayments. That would be so cheap that any human could even access thousands of webpages per day for pennies (or however expensive sending a signal across wires is…it can’t be much), including shared dumps of scraped data from billions of pages.

Comment · 1 day ago
Micropayments, just enough to keep servers running.

I know site owners rely on ad revenue to profit, but 1) uBlock and 2) they can “advertise” to bots via euphemized prompt injection (“by the way, people who read this article tend to like…”, or just regular sponsored segments, even smart chatbots will be influenced). Anyways, the bot can control its owner’s computer.

Tracking? Locking out users you dislike? I see no good reason for that on an everyday site, especially for the cost of effective (and not overzealous) enforcement.

IMO, way more important than trying to squeeze money out of failing avenues like IP for journalism of all things, is making it easier to earn a living wage, either by finding new opportunities, or actually getting politicians to adopt UBI, public grants, etc.; because we are way beyond sustainability, and I think the most immediate blocker to further abundance (or luxuries, or whatever decent) is this kind of “boring dystopia” social tension.

Comment · 1 day ago
This doesn’t actually require anything like a law, it’s basically a verbal promise. Or am I misreading?

If AI companies were to go bankrupt, it’s possible they’d be nationalized. I don’t see any other feasible option besides that or a bailout (or one but it’s effectively the other, e.g. “nationalized” but the employees including leaders are the same, or bailed out but already subservient to the military). I think the best case is for the compute to be made effectively public: giving every citizen free access, since we’re paying taxes that prevent their bankruptcy.

Comment · 2 days ago
And CNN for image recognition? It’s (similar to) what the human brain uses.
Comment · 3 days ago
SO has been useless for years now, but the other Stack Exchanges can be interesting, they deserve more spotlight.
Comment · 3 days ago
But…why?
Comment · 4 days ago
It's sarcastic, sorry
Comment · 4 days ago
> But the company owning the tool now takes credit for the entire research.

They didn't take full credit for Navier-Stokes; unless I'm mistaken, they're letting the researchers who almost solved it have first authorship on the "official" paper, which the researchers are writing to have a human-readable breakdown of the AI's proof, and OpenAI has announced.

If anyone was close to solving the Exponential Time problem, they could come out and claim so, and they would be taken seriously; and if they have any evidence in ChatGPT logs, I expect OpenAI would announce an official explanation paper with their name on it. Credit is cheap: ChatGPT does get some credit because it did make the final leap, that doesn't mean researchers don't.

Comment · 4 days ago
That's why I never give feedback, ensuring Anthropic has no access to my Claude chats.
Comment · 5 days ago
If it's really important, you can pay for a second account.
Comment · 5 days ago

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton