archsurface

If you're getting downvoted you still have a personality.

You too?

[flagged]

I like this answer because you pretend you're arguing against the comment without actually addressing anything.

Communication lines are always open for discussion and negotiation; the end of one agreement doesn't mean no more agreements.

She stated they had unprecedented levels of enriched uranium for a country without weapons.

I don't watch Fox News. Blair and Bush lying about Iraq, doesn't mean Iran isn't working towards weapons. I'm all for prosecuting Blair and Bush, always have been. This is not a matter in which you can just sit back and say "well, hopefully it's all innocent". Iran had to be open - they were the opposite.

Reversion to mean. Pre-78.

They could have simply had IAEA inspections.

Gabbard has recently stated that's not true, that she was quoted out of context.

That would be pointlessly defeatist. Also, other parties are involved to bear witness.

Well, it takes about 20 years. Throw in a virus, assassinations, inspections, ... sounds about right.

Facilities deep in a mountain, no IAEA access, refusal to negotiate, October 7th, ... You'd have to be quite naive to think it's all above board. (Instead of under a mountain).

He didn't. The war was already started, he lent brief assistance.