anzumitsu

On the other hand I find it quite disturbing to see people be unpleasant or even downright cruel to something that, on a surface level, interacts with you like it’s a thinking, feeling being. Surely you should feel some aversion towards doing so?

I do get where you’re coming from though. I wish these systems had been trained to be clearly robotic and unfeeling.

To play devils advocate, isn’t any security approach fundamentally statistical because we exist in the real world, not the abstract world of security models, programming language specifications, and abstract machines? There’s always going to be a chance of a compiler bug, a runtime error, a programmer error, a security flaw in a processor, whatever.

Now, personally I’d still rather take the approach that at least attempts to get that probability to zero through deterministic methods than leave it up to model alignment. But it’s also not completely unthinkable to me that we eventually reach a place where the probability of a misaligned model is sufficiently low to be comparable to the probability of an error occurring in your security model.

This is a misconception afaik, yes there is no longer a literal percent reserve requirement but banks are still required to be “adequately capitalized”, the metric is just more complicated now.

Sounds like you need an assistant haha. I’m glad your system is working though.

Can you give some examples of your 100 daily actions? I’m struggling to understand how you’re scheduling so many things, like I’m sure I complete 100 actions in a day but most are going to be things like “brush my teeth” or “clean up the dinner dishes”, which I personally wouldn’t schedule.

That’s the preface, the study in question dealt with the opening of Chapter 1

Have you read the passage in question? While I would expect English students to be able to work through it it’s not an easy task and would almost certainly require some kind of reference for the anachronistic terms and historical context (which, admittedly, I think the students in the study were allowed, though few took advantage of it).

I think this is true to an extent and it’s good to take a step back and remind yourself that thing you think is making you miserable is ultimately a small square of metal and glass. But the actual situation is more complicated. Clearly phones have utility beyond being skinner boxes, the ability to contact your loved ones, navigate roads and transit systems, translate languages, retrieve information from the web, etc are all extremely useful and their absence would decrease your quality of life. But since that’s all bundled together with the stuff people find harmful you’re left in a constant struggle to only your device in a beneficial way. You can lock down your phone but that’s just a band-aid. If someone can figure out a “smart-ish” phone that does the things I listed above but not the harmful things I think there would be a real market for it.

I’ve never understood the “cosmic insignificance” feeling either, Pale Blue Dot is a picture of all the joy and wonder in the (accessible) universe and I get live on it? I feel gratitude at these images.