anon463637
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
At least a mail-in ballot usually has a "receipt," (that serial number thing that's torn off at the top/bottom) although it does little to show or prove a vote was counted, especially with the subjectiveness of interpreting handwritten marks. The bigger problem is electronic voting has no real records making it far easier to manipulate because there's nothing permanent to recount.
I suggest that to solve the receipt issue, privacy, speed of counting and accuracy to the best degree available, it's best to:
0. Make voting day a national holiday.
1. Mail every voter a durable, physical RFID token (signed by a closely-held private key) that has an unique code that is not recorded who it is given to. If they haven't received one before voting in-person, they can receive a random token.
2. The voter is first checked to make sure they haven't yet voted by keeping a database of "has voted"... completely independent of actual votes.
3. The voter either drops-off the RFID in a container in a booth for their vote preference, or they mail it sealed in two envelopes (outer mailing info, inner vote preference).
4. Votes are counted both by weight and by RFID scanning (whole containers of votes are scanned in batch) for redundancy.
5. Voters can check online in real-time if their vote was counted by searching for the RFID code they used.
6. Recounts are a matter of mass-scanning large containers (with appropriate chain-of-custody) of votes.
7. Tokens are reused to reduce waste.
1. No paper record.
2. No privacy.
A better way would be to use anonymous physical RFID pebbles that are placed in a container to indicate voting preference. Votes can be both weighed and scanned for counting redundancy very quickly.
Mail-in voting would consist of mailing back the pebble chit in an outside return envelope with an inner vote envelope designating the preference; the outer envelope is removed and mixed with many others before sorting.
Then later, no matter how a vote was cast, it's possible to find how a vote was counted (by the voter searching for the RFID code(s) they used) in real-time because all votes were mass-scanned in RFID containers... that is, there will be a number of large containers that contain all votes for a particular preference in a particular election. Subsequent elections reuse the RFIDs to eliminate waste. No hanging chads, no provisional ballots, no hacked voting machines and no voting by mobile.
+ often all-in/TCO cheaper than owning
+ less liabilities if/when expensive items break; landlord is in-charge of must repairs and expenses
+ easier to move
Upsides to owning
+ neighbors are further away
+ potentially quieter
+ customization (upgrades, ability to modify, holes in walls)
+ able to purchase reliable/cheaper over lifecycle (TCO) items
+ feeling of dominion/stability
There are other options too: rubbertramp/vanlife, leathertramp, oceantramp, go expat in cheaper countries
IANAL: Btw, has anyone asked a lawyer if this is a crime in any state or country?
Only a privileged few can take sabbaticals or work wherever/whenever they want.
If you want less micromorts, stick to well-maintained older 737's/777's and Airbus.
PS: Has anyone used FireChat in a crowd scenario without internet? There's no privacy and Bluetooth MAC is identifiable obviously, but it circumvents turning off mobile and internet.
0) Getting antidepressants because you won't want to do anything much when you're depressed.
1) Getting meds if you have ADD because you will always be starting something else to never finish in order to repeat the cycle over-and-over again.
Who owns which domain will always be centralized if only one group or individual can own a particular name. Having multiple domain name systems creates chaos.
Privacy can be solved on the client-side with VPNs or DNS resolution encrypted proxies (dnscrypt) and private registration (by the owner).
Security (integrity and non-repudiation) already exists in the form of DNSSEC and DANE. It's a Catch-22 to say it's not when it clearly exists. It's imperfect but it does exist.
ICANN was supposed to/should've been a steward in the interests of all people, not just corporations.
You can't replace it with something else and expect a different result. All you're doing is moving problems around without addressing them. Emperor's new clothes won't fix that, sorry.