anankaie

That is not quite accurate -- the Game Pass library was a subset of what could be streamed -- things that were not available in Game Pass could still be streamed provided you owned them. When games went out of Game Pass you could purchase them and continue streaming.

Everyone ready for the new "date/time hates you" bugs?

Though not having to do the leap smear might be easier?

The cons example is conflating implementation details (return the value passed in to cons) with the semantics (return the left-side of this pair that was instantiated by cons). In the first case it is a category error to think about mutability. In the second mutability makes perfect sense.

Moreover, I suspect it is possible to construct an interface such that to prove statically that you can Liskov Substitute a type into it would be equivalent to deciding Halt: All you need are extensional semantics in your type system.

Or implement tsaot

At this point it feels more difficult to ensure that your format cannot compute than to ensure it can

In their defense (both OP and HubSpot) the original is written to customers already aware of the context, and HackerNews asks submitters not to editorialize by default.

Moreover, the Library of Congress ruled that LLM outputs are not copyrightable, so technically, Anthropic has even less claim here.

Clair Obscur was perfectly playable for me through GeForce Now, for what it is worth, even when hitting parry timing. (N = 1, but a datum nonetheless)

The harness? I believe the company is planning to ease off in favor of Copilot. But we have our choice of models to use in Copilot, which feature Anthropic's as well.

I work at Microsoft. This is in the top tier of “things that did not happen”

Given that AI has successfully induced lawyers to use hallucinated cases, I would argue it is already convincing at it, to boot.

To be fair, to some extent that’s up to us. Time to get cleaning, I guess.

This article seems to miss Dawkins' point, which is not to assert that Claude is conscious -- he clearly states that he does not actually know. He seeks to wonder what brought about the evolution of consciousness in the first place.