amznthrowaway4
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
These aren't controversial, even though they reduce revenue, because they improve the customer experience.
But, as per usual, Paul Graham is full of shit. He is interested in challenging other people, but he is absolutely and totally unwilling to be challenged in any material way.
And heaven forbid you challenge any aspect of one of his most highly valued portfolio companies... lol... you'll be banned right out of this place.
because Paul Graham absolutely LOVES declaring some things heres and he LOVES to suppress speech.
He just wants to be the one who declares what is heretical and what is not.
Why are you tolerant of these problems in one case, but extremely bothered by them in the other?
Or is your support of these limits scoped specifically to anti-western muslim terrorists?
Do you think ISIS and Al Qaeda should have broader reach?
No practical value, no industrial value, no means to materially change the rate of production, nothing special at all except that it is rare, only a few people care about it, and its price will always depend primarily on the behavior of a very small number of market participants.