amelius

But on the other hand, you can use AI now to find those vulnerabilities.

Did they have coral reefs?

So basically this is advocating to replace a human's own warning system by technology? Sounds like a lost cause ...

> Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!

I'm not a lawyer and don't like writing sentences with "probability bordering on certainty", etc.

Formally verified code.

Have you not heard of supply chain attacks?

If this was true then Python would already have been rewritten to be GIL-free, and the entire ecosystem of Python packages would have been rewritten to respect its API.

Who can afford to sleep in this race to the bottom?

How to get rioting people off the streets and into their homes watching Netflix ...

Let's see ...

Content tax?

> What it cost us

> None of this was free. Through the summer, much of our engineering effort went into tests and tooling, and customer-facing changes per engineer stayed between 17 and 30 a month.

What it cost you is that you helped the AI labs become better engineers. At a certain point the Big Flip will happen, and the AI labs will stop their offerings and instead start competing with the engineers.

The problem with language models is their bias. Train a model on pure math and THEN when it starts talking by itself about consciousness (*), then we can say: that's odd.

(*) of course in its own language

Would love to read "the tao of Picard" (if it existed)

Except those things have broadly recognized benefits for everybody.