Recent submissions

Comment · 5 days ago
Comment · 10 days ago
If you fell down and broke your legs and they healed to be 20% longer and stronger than before, yes.

I encourage you to take your own advice and actually read the links to get a full picture of the available science and data. Climate change is real and a serious problem, but not every single thing you are fed by your algorithms is the ground truth. Nitpicking one example and ignoring the entire body of science is just as dishonest as folks who deny climate change.

Here's a paper you can read and not just dismiss as something that I didn't read [1]. Some islands will vanish, some will grow, it's not as simple as everything is doomed everywhere. Have fun reading :)

> This record comprises 568 islands from 42 atolls spanning the western to the central Pacific Ocean from the Federated States of Micronesia, Marshall Islands, Kiribati and Tuvalu, and is one of the first robust attempts to statistically attribute the drivers of observed island changes within the past half-century. Our analyses demonstrate that island change and a range of its potential controls, including oceanographic, climatic and local-scale morphometric characteristics of reefs and islands, are not correlated, underscoring that no single variable could predict a uniform response across the study islands. The lack of association between sea-level rise and shoreline change on this large sample of islands addresses the common notion of a linear relationship between rising sea levels and magnitude of erosion in reef island systems.

> Analysis of 568 islands across the Pacific indicates that most islands have exhibited significant morphological changes over the timescale of analysis (1944–2018). Accretion was observed on 39% of transects, while 27% of transects showed erosion. Aggregated at the island scale, the balance of erosional and accretionary changes indicates a predominance of accretion on islands, with an average shoreline change of 0.51 m/decade resulting in a net expansion of 444.63 ha (~ 2.25%) of land area.

[1] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10113-023-02103-5

Comment · 11 days ago
Comment · 11 days ago
Comment · 11 days ago
> Sure, during that decline there's going to be issues, but once you hit a new stable population those would go away.

I think you're compressing a lot of hardship into "issues"... It's not about total number of people, it's about demographic distribution. If half of your population is at retirement age, who is going to take care of them? Who will be working to generate tax revenue to provide the social services that you expect?

Also populations don't just stabilize, they feed back off of themselves. If half of your population isn't procreating, you get fewer and fewer babies which is a vicious cycle. There aren't many policy levers to pull during demographic free fall.

Comment · 24 days ago
> The wind, solar and ess manufacturers got down the learning curve largely because of industrial energy + market transformation policy.

Which manufacturers in the US are you referring to? Almost all of the work to get these technologies at their current costs were done by non-US companies. I do broadly agree with your point, but the in the case of the US, policy has done very little in decarbonizing the economy.

Comment · 26 days ago
Show me where any politician on either side has made a real impact on any of these charts: https://ember-energy.org/countries-and-regions/united-states...

The US is switching to cleaner (coal -> gas) energy, renewables (solar and wind), and BESS almost entirely because it's cost effective and cheaper than the alternative.

Comment · 1 month ago
This is cool and definitely interesting, but the title is really overselling what the authors are trying to demonstrate. Astra can "drive" a car at ~.42 m/s within a set of boundaries that are 2-3 times the width of a normal lane, on a closed course, with 0 unexpected obstacles, in dry conditions, in daylight for $7.74. And unless you start and then stop every few seconds while driving, this is barely considered driving. Still very cool and an interesting benchmark!
Comment · 1 month ago
I'm not sure how this relates to "building a product in the age of AI" or being wrong at all, this is just a list of steps that an elementary school student would be taught when learning how to approach any reasonably complex problem.
Comment · 1 month ago
> leading American soldiers to die in a futile war

There have literally been 0 American soldier casualties in Israel as a result of this war.

> events in Sudan that are horrible but largely irrelevant to American politics

If you only care about human suffering if it relates to American politics, then sure I guess. Hundreds of thousands of people are dead with millions displaced. The US has been directly carrying out strikes in Yemen for 2 decades now (hundreds of strikes with likely thousands of casualties) and no one talks about it or cares.

Comment · 1 month ago
It was sarcasm to the post above.
Comment · 1 month ago
> When we talk about wealth, we mainly talk about billionaires. But what if that’s not the most important truth about wealth in America? What if there were another group that, without drawing much attention, had grown collectively thirteen times richer than the Forbes 400? And that was even more effective at using its financial-political clout?

Yes, collectively the 5 million wealthiest households in America are equivalent to the richest 400 people. Somehow the people who build businesses for themselves in regulated industries are the the real villains, not the billionaires who "donate" their way into political positions... sure.

Comment · 1 month ago
> they can continuously use it for a long time with out participating in the economy

Yeah, low-cost, low-maintenance, clean energy from the Sun is great and all, but I can't shake the feeling that I'm just not participating the economy enough. Heating and cooling my home with renewable energy is great for my Family and my community but I really should think of the energy sector and their shareholders first.

Comment · 1 month ago
Ring cameras don't record and index every single license plate that it sees and hand that data over directly to law enforcement. There's a huge difference between surveilling your own private property, and a massive network of ALPRs feeding data directly into government systems.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton