alex-
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
However if you truly do always want to be improving your ability as a software engineer, then you are in luck, this field is so vast and deep that you can easily spend more than a lifetime improving! Finding out how and measuring it is another matter.
>>> matrix = [(1,2,3),(4,5,6),(7,8,9)]
>>> list(zip(*matrix))
[(1, 4, 7), (2, 5, 8), (3, 6, 9)]
Not as readable as a real maths library, but pretty cool and educational.
Think I came across it in Python in a nut shell, by Alex Martelli
Edit: formatting
I am interested in seeing the source :)
I like to think we are all 10x developers. The question of a 1x developer should be how to grow their productivity (assuming they are motivated to do so). Less productive developers should not feel like they have one tenth of the natural talent someone else has. Instead they should look at how they can improve their work flow/knowledge and companies should try and maximise the output of their employees.
Yes some people will always be better/more productive than others, but most people are differentiated by completely controllable factors.
Obviously that it not an option for every site but access to my password manager, alone, will not provide access to my email (which lets me rest all my accounts) or my bank etc
Of course I use two factor on the manager too.
It doesn't completely solve the problem but I haven't found a better alternative (that works for me)
The idea of this PEP is to add frame evaluation into cPython. As the PEP says "For instance, it would not be difficult to implement a tracing or profiling function at the call level with this API"
Elizaveta Shashkova (a PyCharm developer at JetBrains) gave a really good talk on the subject at this years PyCon ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdObDUbLjdg ).
I invested $15 in stay https://cordlessdog.com/stay/
I would not say the problem is solved (it's not going to solve artifacts, etc), but it helped me.