alboaie

Looks usefull. Could you explain how it works? you have to chain it after the call from other LLM ?

Now, Japan has expanded its territory. This is a common method for increasing land area, correct?

In my opinion, believing that adherence to processes is beneficial is a flawed thing, applicable mainly to highly repetitive and mundane tasks. For example now I am 100% focused on expediting the progress of projects that I start, including AssistOS (blog.assistos.net) initiated this year. Anticipating a period of considerable chaos ahead, my sole process involves a firm belief in the utility of the project. Additionally, I somewhat subscribe to a Kabbalistic approach to life, where the intention of contributing positively to the world invariably brings reciprocal rewards. I am committed to adapting to every emerging opportunity to advance the execution of my projects as effectively as possible. Act quickly on what you believe will benefit both you and others. Don't overthink or aim for perfection. You'll make many mistakes, but that's okay; it's the best way to learn quickly.

After an editor, who has edited millions of pages and seems to be a jack-of-all-trades, unjustifiably rejects your contribution on a topic where you have dozens of scientific articles published, the only conclusion is that the system is flawed. There's a need for a fundamental change in approach, probably to a system where censorship exists only in cases of clearly illegal content, and various opinions are allowed to be expressed. On the other hand, to filter out the noise, there's a need for a trust propagation system among editors and viewers, so that each time, you get the most probable form of a page based on the trust given to direct contacts and indirectly to recursive contacts. Maybe AI could also help a bit. Who dare to start a new Wikipedia ;) ?

Exciting concept! Empowering employees for bold decisions with accountability can boost org effectiveness. Crafting a credit system for personal and institutional risk assurance is a thrilling research. But "important" persons are probably bussy managing their curent brand and social influence...

Capturing a billion or even trillion-dollar value proposition awaits entrepreneurs who seize the opportunity to implement AI moderators in platforms like Wikipedia, search engines, and social networks. This disruptive potential beckons ambitious innovators to enter the market, positioning themselves to challenge and reshape the industry while creating substantial economic value.

It will kill startups working on AI Agents, it is already clear from the last updates that they compete with the APIs customers and that is bad for the creative startups. The world require better open source LLLm models. Akso the startups should lwarn to collaborate and not reinvent everything, but how to do it is an unsolved challenge in the current capitalist economic model...

They do not invest much in complex UI, everything they ship is based on the chat methaphor and the inteligence of their LLMs. Clever. But sooner or later the AI should go to the level if operating systems or at least should replace all kinds of applications and interfere with complex workflows. The details and difficulty to decide what is opinion and what is obhective fact will slowdown everything as for everybody else.

The post is long, may be is a good ideea to start with conclussions...

Is there a possibility of flight disruptions in Europe?

From discussions it seems that the problem is that many subreddits will be going private to protest the recent Reddit API costs changes. Some will not come back unless the change is reverted. If the change is never reverted, they will be gone forever and this project is trying to save old posts so they can still be seen even though the subreddits are private. Not sure how usefull it will be... but somehow interesting as an example of reaction of policies changes of centralised social networks

"A cold, dark universe is billions, if not trillions, of years in the future. Between now and then, humans will face plenty of other calamities: wars and pestilences, ice ages, asteroid impacts, and the eventual consumption of Earth—in about 5 billion years—as our sun expands into a red giant star. To last until the very end of the universe, an advanced civilization will have to master interstellar travel, spreading far and wide throughout the galaxy and learning to cope with a slowing, cooling, darkening cosmos. Their greatest challenge will be figuring out how to not be here when the universe dies, essentially finding a way to undertake the ultimate journey of fleeing this universe for another.

Such a plan may sound absurd. But there is nothing in physics that forbids such a venture. Einstein’s theory of general relativity allows for the existence of wormholes, sometimes called Einstein-Rosen bridges, that connect parallel universes. Among theoretical and experimental physicists, parallel universes are not science fiction. The notion of the multiverse—that our universe coexists with an infinite number of other universes—has gained ground among working scientists." From article... The infinite concept is probably a human made conncept so and anyway 1 million years is probably more than enough to change your "identity" a few hundreds time (at least). So this surving the end of the universe is a bit too much to consider even in the wildest fantasies ;)

Nobody reading HN?

it remembers ue about the inevitable tension between eficiency and resilience...

The best one that could replace all: Getting things done without doing them (yourself)