Recent submissions

Comment · 9 years ago
Comment · 9 years ago
It's an OSS, so guess the first step is to build the technology, then licensing.
Comment · 9 years ago
Comment · 10 years ago
Having a CLI doesn't mean they are close. In Google cloud, you still work with VMs, cluster, schedulers. In Hyper, you work only with Docker, everything is container native!

Per-second is perfect for Serverless, Data mining, CI/CD, etc. It is simply not cost effective to go with per hour/minute rate.

Comment · 10 years ago
Why "low traffic sites"?
Comment · 10 years ago
The bigger sizes? Yes, but the small ones work pretty sweet. And the per-second billing!
Comment · 10 years ago
Had you tried hyper.sh? All you need is the compose file, no more terraform and ansible.
Comment · 10 years ago
Checkout https://github.com/jenkinsci/hyper-slaves-plugin. This plugin will launch your buildjobs as on-demand containers in Hyper.sh, then you don't even need the long-running huge VM!
Comment · 10 years ago
Guys, you really want to give a look to hyper.sh, if you are frustrated with running containers in production.
Comment · 10 years ago
Take a look at hyper.sh, if you are using docker.
Comment · 10 years ago
The idea of Swarm is the cluster works like one single virtual host. In that case, checkout hyper.sh. You don't care about the cluster thing at all in it, because their entire cloud works like one host.
Comment · 10 years ago
What do you mean "configure Docker"?

Check out hyper.sh. They allow to launch a Docker image in ~3-5s, without the need to maintain a VM cluster. You can use an API service to automate the provisioning, and then forget about the infra thing.

Comment · 10 years ago
I don't think rkt is a valid candidate. People are already used to the basic of Docker command. There is no reason to change to something else. If rkt decides to reproduce the feature set, how is that different from a fork?

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton