al_gore

It's too bad he died, because I'd love to see him shoved into the back of a police car for his wage fixing.

Meanwhile, Schmidt walks alive and free. Ah, life for the rich.

HEET turnstiles?

I get what you're going for, but it's pretty much openly legal to kill pedestrians with cars (in the US, at least). "No criminality suspected"!

This is just plain old C (which, yes, Objective-C is a superset of).

or just != 0

There is nowhere that I particularly want to live that I could possibly afford to buy in, though.

> Auto-updating rather than re-cloning and dragging files back into your project

That's the least usable way to do it, though. Use static library projects in submodules and a workspace/nested projects, and updated submodules will Just Work (unless there are breaking API changes, but Cocoapods can't help you there).

The main advantage of Cocoapods is shared dependencies. If you don't have those, it doesn't offer you much besides a non-git-native way to manage dependencies. Also, not having to manually edit your Xcode project to get the correct, single component path (instead of an absurd relative one) for a static library after changing to BUILT_PRODUCTS_DIR (why this has never been fixed, I have no idea).

I don't know if agents would work - they work in movies because you shoot one, then wrap and move on to the next one. An agent can be constantly looking out for new films to work in. Unless you're exclusively seeking short-term contract positions, will you actually communicate with the agent frequently enough to build a relationship? If an agent keeps placing you in companies that either implode or make you want to leave, it doesn't seem appealing to work with them again. If they do place you in a job that you stay at for multiple years, will they be available when you want to move on?

100 years ago, you could use cut and cover without enraging a bunch of UES rich people. Oh well.

I think the MBTA is better than Muni + BART, the percentage of proper heavy rail rapid transit is much higher in Boston (just the meh Green Line, compared to every meh Muni line).

Billions of dollars of "studies" and such, I'm sure. NIMBYs hate cut and cover, so we end up digging absurdly expensive deep tunnels that are just worse to use once finished (they take forever to get into, compare deep stations in Washington Heights to Astor Place).

The Green Line in Boston runs down a protected center path in the road for a significant portion. Is there a reason that SF can't carve out those lanes for exclusive Muni use?

This is true, but there's no reason that San Francisco itself couldn't have proper rapid transit instead of street cars. Even just removing cars from those streets and creating dedicated lanes (these exist in some places, of course) would be a huge help.