airplane
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycin
"it proposed an acceptable therapy in about 69% of cases, which was better than the performance of infectious disease experts who were judged using the same criteria."
I vaguely remember stories about game companies legally going after companies making bots.
Would uploading an API like this open someone up to a lawsuit? What about someone uploading a bot or a botting framework?
Also, does this API depend on running on Android?
Perhaps these guys in the video run too small of an operation to have the costs spread around and to invest in tech to speed up the process.
MISRA is not on the same level as DO-178. DO-178 covers a lot of ground, from testing, documentation, requirements, that sort of thing, and it's made by a government agency which enforces it during certification, where every single hardware and software component in the aircraft related to flight operations is certified individually. So you will actually have engineers from the FAA sit down and look at code coverage, how requirements are written, how they map to tests, see if the tests cover a lot of cases in your requirements, see if the code implements the requirements, that sort of thing.
MISRA on the other hand are treated like guidelines that car manufacturers generally want you to meet when you deliver them a vehicle component.
There is the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards you have to meet on a vehicle as a whole, but I do not know if they have to prove that they meet the following during a formal certification process. http://www.nhtsa.gov/cars/rules/import/FMVSS/
So as far as I know, there's big approval process at the end for vehicles, while there's a formal certification process for all components in an aircraft, as well as a big approval process at the end for aircraft.
Someone please correct and fill in the blanks for the vehicle side of things.
Can a language could resolve this issue without generics or some other contract feature (which Java did later add), or without limiting the scope of array definitions and their use?
May be good to note that Array<Dog> doesn't actually extend Array<Animal>, so there shouldn't be any polymorphic usage between them, and the return statement and method call scenarios are compile time errors with proper generics.