Recent submissions

Comment · 9 years ago
Well mostly because they don't rely on any legacy code base but they can write it all by themselves. Also Google has somewhat of an reputation for security other than Cisco.
Comment · 9 years ago
Just skimmed the text and read the comments here TBH, but I can already see were this is going. Of course the brain is complex and we don't understand it and even if Elon might not succeed with Neuralink (in the decade to market plan) it is still worth exploring. So stop hating gizmodo.
Comment · 9 years ago
If I recall correctly Google built its own network gear long time ago. Completely makes sense. Looking at Cisco product with regard to security & the recent NSA leaks you really don't want your network gear from them.
Comment · 9 years ago
No, they cut your service when you get too much traffic!!!
Comment · 9 years ago
Nonono there is so much wrong here.

Sample size: 20 people. (Okay what? Are you even trying guys? Releasing something about the the human metabolism with a sample size of 20? Shame on you!) Concluding a weight gain because Ghrelin levels are raised? What? Do you even science? Ghrelin in the first place only tells your brain to look for more food because it signals an empty stomach.

Studies on Nutrition don't get me started...

Comment · 9 years ago
And that's why only Doctors can hand out prescriptions and they are trained to evaluate the risk for you. So this system should actually work fine.
Comment · 9 years ago
Doesn't matter. To general masses it just looks (and well you will have to change code) like they shut down another thing after short time people relied on. Bad move Google. Just stop offering it and keep in running in quiet for people who have it next time.
Comment · 9 years ago
Make sure to visit the "Runde Ecke" in Leipzig to get a feel for what happens when we let the government create unlimited surveillance.
Comment · 9 years ago
I really hope that more ML/AI research is directed into health care and scientific research. Don't waste your energy on selling ads guys!
Comment · 9 years ago
Exactly.
Comment · 9 years ago
> It didn’t have to be this way. Ev could have RECONSIDERED. He surely had enough in the bank from previous exploits. Started slower. Not hired 150 people before there was a path to profitability, let alone sustainability. Maybe you will.

Well the Twitter folks is not known for clever business moves. Seriously though, how do you need 150 people for that website?!

Comment · 9 years ago
No. They refocus.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton