agumonkey

ahh right, I didn't read the github project owner, now it all make sense :)

I can use nail guns fine, I just don't want to live in a world of people who only know nail guns, and keep my brain / body stimulated.

How come these regimes can only breed excellence for illegal stuff and not solving other issues for their country.

oh really ? I never poked at that kind of problems using claude. still interesting that claude's training placed lisp at the top for IR stages.. even though historically it's obviously one of the culture that worked on interpretation and compilation the most, it's not mainstream. But I guess for sql engine teams, it decided that it was perfectly on point.

the day hardware and whatever ml engine reach apple ii cost then yeah everybody will just let it run

Are the pgrust guys lisper historically ?

How do you guys fight deskilling ? I can see my brain rot from reviewing $current_llm approaches to solving jira tickets.

What would be the list? NK, then Russia, anybody else ?

is it mathematically viable ? (aka no regression)

stings to see emacs keybinding hardcoded

unless someone can offer a custom keybinding mechanism.. and custom dynamic functions the user can bind to..

I know nothing about railroad systems but in complicated / ambiguous situations, is it possible to limit train speed to make it easier to monitor or control traffic ?

At the highest level it could be, but I can't see my future not learning more. So I'm trying to find a list of things that might still have some work value.

Considering the fact that mainstream dev (aka boilerplate, route, orm, docker) might evaporate in the coming years. Is discrete math/graph theory a good starting point to pivot if software engineering is disrupted ?

I find it interesting actually. Not embarrassing. You mastered the feature layer more than I. I went into lisp with dreams of making my own features but turns out I was quite limited.

Different psychologies