agrona
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
>Have you ever did a code review, and gave feedback that was longer than doing the fix yourself, while you’re at it?
But this seems to neglect the utility of teaching people to do things correctly. Sure, I could always just fix junior programmers' mistakes, but it seems better to educate them in the first place.
Sending the fixes back down doesn't seem like it would have the same impact.
Hopefully a lot more visibly, this time.
>Send me your automoderator rule once it's done, we'll add it our sub as well.
Seems likely to spread pretty quickly.
In addition to the GiveWell reports, GiveDirectly also document and publish their work and research. It's exciting to see the impact that they are having (and how minimal the systemic abuse of the money is):
>We have no control over our basal metabolic rate
and then links to a page[1] that explains
>Muscle cells require more energy to maintain than fat cells, so people with a higher muscle to fat ratio tend to have a higher BMR.
and
>Muscle tissue burns more calories than fat tissue, so increasing your muscle mass will help you lose weight.
It doesn't seem to address this discrepancy, though (that by exercising to build muscle mass one can affect their BMR and thus the lion's share of the calories burned).
[1] http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/loseweight/Pages/how-can-I-speed-...
They remind me of the (absolutely fascinating) "Go first" dice[1], any subset of which are guaranteed to produce a perfectly fair ranking.
Our first event was a lot of work and these are entirely labors of love--the ticket cost lets us basically break even.
The "MegaGame Society" is sort of the over-arching organizing group (they licensed Watch the Skies from the UK group, updated it significantly, and are recruiting more groups to run it locally).
They're definitely the folks to follow for information on games outside of the UK.
The confusion arises because the antecedent of "it" is unclear.
I read "it" as referring to "gay marriage" and not "the case against gay marriage". How confusing.
However, the article seems to be saying the opposite: top law firms are all FOR it, and those opposed don't have top representation.
[1] http://eyesonthesky.com/StarCharts/FirstLightGuides.aspx
They looked at me as if I had just asked them to sell me a unicorn. They then offered to custom cut a piece of paper for what I'd approximate as several tens of thousands of percent markup.
So what you're seeing is cross-pollination. I'm honestly surprised to not see this comment down-voted, as it's pretty impertinent to the conversation and is textbook ad hominem. ("Crazy lady says prisons are terrible: who cares she's crazy").
[1] http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/2r7y8h/when.... You can see it with something like http://uneddit.com/
edit: oh, I see my second paragraph basically did happen already in some flagkilled posts.