Recent submissions

Comment · 7 days ago
A few years ago I participated in a committee of individual contributors tasked with proposing a set of core values to management (who would then integrate it into their core values and propose it to execs…who would then integrate it into their core values and propose it to the PE Board and…)

Not sure what happened between us and the other nodes on that telephone game but these exact four “core values” (enron) popped out.

A couple years later, 100% of the ICs on that committee are still around. Most of the management layer and nearly all of the exec layer are gone.

Comment · 6 months ago
...or convincing operators that jobs sent to their machines are legal, legitimate, and non-nefarious.

I could not find disclosure on their site about the guard-railing or safety-systems at the point the prompt is gathered from users which would intercept, log & prevent bad actors from inadvertently involving me in something illegal or immoral as an operator. Perhaps that disclosure exists and I just need to be linked to it; that would be welcome.

Comment · 7 months ago
I still contend that the worst volume control UX is asking your teenager to turn it down…
Comment · 8 months ago
Amazing how analogous this is to the early Internet when people started running web servers out of their basement and then eventually graduated up to being their own dial-in ISP…
Comment · 8 months ago
Admirable idea and execution…but it does apply opposing evolutionary/economic pressure for AI-slop to become less detectable over time. AI will learn and adapt.

Metaphorically speaking, it’s the Borg we’re dealing with, not the Klingons. All Janeway did was slow the Borg’s progress.

Comment · 8 months ago
The basic search one gets out of the box is closer to regex matching than search. IMHO something like omnisearch should be sherlocked next.
Comment · 8 months ago
It’s a truly remarkable app you and team have built. I’m going to use the term _simple_ but please understand that that’s high praise.

To me, obsidian is a thought-taking app, not a notetaking app. Thoughts are amorphous and incomplete no matter how much you embellish them. They don’t belong in only one place with only one label or pinned to only one date. They reach out to each other. Merge and split. They sit inside each other sometimes.

Obsidian gets that. It offers _just enough_ structure and automation and operating system (of a kind) to force the binary file system on some silicon to work like our brains do...and not the other way around.

Comment · 8 months ago
Just for context, Steph Ango is the CEO of Obsidian. His approach to notetaking in his own app made the rounds in the PKM (personal knowledge management) community for how _counterintuitive_ it was.

He eschews a lot of the common wisdom pushed by influencers in this space who tout "the one true way™" to stay organized. File splattered in the root? Sure. Unresolved links to notes that don't exist and probably never will? Why not! Blank daily notes that aren't carefully manicured journal tomes? Heck yeah.

His point is "perfect is the enemy of good." You could carefully curate and perfect your pkm...or you could have a life.

Comment · 8 months ago
Comment · 9 months ago
This is roughly my defense against anxieties about “missing the boat” on this stuff. If my life was complex enough to justify quote-simplifying-unquote it with a tool like this, I’d be quite excited about experimenting with it…but it’s not. And I don’t relish artificially adding that complexity.

The key to productivity is doing the _right_ things, not doing everything. Tools that make more possible frequently miss the point entirely.

Comment · 9 months ago
It’s admirable to have standard morals and pursue objective truth. However, the real world is a messy confusing place riddled in fog which limits one foresight of the consequences & confluences of one’s actions. I read this section of Anthropic’s Constitution as “do your moral best in this complex world of ours” and that’s reasonable for us all to follow not just AI.
Comment · 10 months ago
It’s more like the definition of “alien” broadened.

It started out in the 1960’s meaning “humans with pointy ears and no emotions”, then in the 1980’s it was “squat humanoids with glowing fingers and a penchant for phoning home”, then in the 1990-2000 it was “infectious microbes that turn humans into zombies”. We pretty much all realized that the “life” part of “alien life” spans the entire breadth of what biology can produce. (The 2020’s even reduced it further to “RNA sequence which connects the entire human race except 13 folks into a vast hive mind”)

Widen the concept enough and lots more scientists will go “yeah something like thst that probably exists elsewhere, sure”

Comment · 1 year ago
We do not have a freedom to movement _by motor vehicle_ in the US.

It is a privilege licensed by the State and regularly revoked through due process or expiry.

While your concern about mobility and privacy are valid, I would contend that public safety is what it’s to be weighed against. Some people really are better riders than drivers.

Comment · 1 year ago
I live in one of the areas they are actively testing/training in. Their cars consistently behave better and more safely than most human drivers that I’m forced to share the road with.

As semi-autonomous and autonomous cars become the norm, I would adore to see obtaining a drivers license ratchet up in difficulty in order to remove dangerous human drivers from the road.

Comment · 1 year ago
Nah, dude. It’s exactly the right amount of subtle that I found it a delight to discover. Making the joke too obvious undercuts it!

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton