aeve890

> 1 million per piece

Zimbabwean dollars I hope because 1 million usd PER BOARD?

What happened to that kind of posts? I haven't seen them in a while. Last one maybe two years ago looking for Stripe support. Are they now automatically deleted or something?

>Do the creators and early investors in the company that might destroy mankind deserve to get rewarded for their efforts?

If AI destroy the world who would make them accountable? If not, then the risk is fictional and doesn't matter.

This shit writes by itself. Easiest best seller ever.

AI = Anti Ictus.

It was there all this time. I need renowned writer Dan Brown's email ASAP.

Adobe? How so? I didn't know Adobe was a big player in the AI boom

Alien technology? What are you talking about.

Is it the same feature offered by SimpleLogin from Protonmail?

>I don't really get why it's a free pass for you though

It doesn't. But I can't for the life of me understand why people keeps trusting Meta, why they keep making Zuckerberg rich and more powerful. He's been doing this for almost 20 years already, nobody can say they didn't know what Meta does. Ok, I get that they couldn't give a shit about privacy, but the consequences of a more invasive and powerful Meta are suffered by the entire world. To me that's stupid, selfish, shortsighted. It's like if you keep going to a restaurant where they served you a literal turd once, then claim it was an oopsie and just keep doing it. Sure in a civilized country they would be out of business and thrown in jail, but still... why the fuck should you keep going there?!!

>It didn't do what was instructed - instructions didn't include hacking into any infrastructure, internal or external

What is it then? It did what it wanted? They are sentient now and their drive is... hacking into systems? Maybe they we're not instructed to hack, but instructed to do what instead?

It's software. It's instructions running on silicon. If you don't hit run, they don't run. If you don't give them instructions, they don't do shit at all. Literally. There's no instance, ever, in history of software running because they wanted to, and acting as they wanted to. They follow instructions, and if they are instructed to reach a goal with a set of tools and given environment, and a way to search the strategy space, they can eventually "hack" if that meet the criteria of success of the instructions given. With access to the same tools and environment you can do the same with a massive decision tree.

Also, "reasoning" is marketing speech, please.

>Meta can't resist an opportunity to spy on its user

People put meta cameras on their faces and go to the bathroom without take them out. Are they children? Are they poor souls without agency on their own? Are they retarded? By now everyone know what Meta does, if you choose to use their products and being spied on, it's on you.

Geez even the literally 1 line "about" is written with AI. What do people mean when they write "so I built..."?

>Hacking incidents this summer show that big labs struggle to control models

The models are software. Software cannot decide by itself to run. Hardware doesn't decide by itself to run either. Someone put software on a machine and ran it with capture the flag instructions and the software did what was instructed using tools available and working in its environment.

I hope this helps.

>10K in gas melts away quickly

Really?. Define "quickly" please.

Edit: nvm. 10k would be just around 95k kms.

Inter-galactic? My dude I think you missed a few steps