acidhousemcnab

They will say "no no, there's no problems we're having with pollution, and we think AI Godtech supremacy is a wonderful idea, and you should definitely pour all of humanities resources into going into space, and liquidate anyone who defies you".

Yes, I prescribe to this, but if you've experienced technologically-augmented attempts at "suiciding", sustained Zersetzung, and a peculiar British invention which is to be "Black-Mirrored", after whistleblowing, then it must be balanced with PTSD, trying not to become an alcoholic, and still trying to sound the alarm about the hell world which exists, is growing, and soon to take over fully.

Time and motion study neurodivergent slave class optimisation.

accepted and transduce'd transgression, creeping nihilisms, sink plug hole funnel

Anti-space, no space, nothingness - annihilation.

Yes sorry, typo.

Sounds like they need to employ more "neurodivergents" to make these robots work correctly, before they are all Silent Greened, and it is only the CEOs left bashing each other's heads in with rocks.

The rogue fissile material left in Iran sounds like an unoriginal plot device from the sketch "American Knights" in 2003-2005 satirical BBC cartoon Monkey Dust, and there are now reports the US intended to reinstall Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, for reasons hitherto unknown.

Yeah, so about that - it’s called Project White Bear, involved UK GCHQ, theatre act called GAYA 4.0, AI human “psychological” experimentation, and propaganda depicting Russians as Mongolian beasts with dripping claws and fangs. Not making this up.

No I'm just not from the United States (or a solipsist).

Perhaps I imagined this, however some months ago on X someone pointed out a historical article on dailymail.co.uk related to Prince Phillip and Epstein had been scrubbed, which likely would be intelligence or through D-Notices, but where instead of showing a 404 page would redirect to an article that was similar but benign. I checked the URL on the Wayback Machine and it turned up zero results, but not even the redirected article, however the user on X had screen grabbed the original, which everyone was reading and commenting on. As of 21st May I can't find this discussion on X and Grok denies it ever existed. This is a "maximally truth-finding" AI, so I must be mistaken. Perhaps the Internet Archive cannot be trusted, so this is why 340 local news outlets need to limit access.