Recent submissions

Comment · 4 years ago
Why wasn't this part of his due diligence before contractually obligating himself to purchase Twitter?
Comment · 4 years ago
My position is that the moderation and content policies ("community guidelines") that private companies and individuals have is also a form of expression. For example, this explains the legality of op/ed pages of newspapers publishing the viewpoints which they choose to, and omitting others. You could sue Fox News or Twitter for censoring or omitting your viewpoint, but this case would not and, in my opinion, should not, be successful.
Comment · 4 years ago
> What about slander and libel laws or laws about claims made in advertisements?

Yep — here we're getting into Prior Restraint. It's both against the law to restrain free speech such as lies, but as you rightly point out, this speech can have other legal consequences.

Comment · 4 years ago
> there could be stronger laws against media which contains objectively provable lies

this is a clear violation of the First Amendment, which makes it legal to publish lies.

Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Imagine a scenario where Twitter and Facebook lose their ability to unconditionally moderate the content of their platforms. Presumably they would need to check with government censors first? Again, I understand how annoying moderation can be! I just don't understand the alternative and I do not see how this alternative is not a huge violation of the First Amendment — this would precisely be the government telling private companies what they can and cannot publish.
Comment · 4 years ago
Do you have any examples of Twitter arresting or imprisoning people for speech, or acquiescing to government censorship? Perhaps you are instead to moderating their private platform and enforcing community guidelines? I understand the latter can be annoying, but it is a mistake to conflate the two, as free speech is something very special and important and in the US is in fact codified into the Bill of Rights.

TL;DR free speech is between you and the government, not between you and someone else or some other company.

Comment · 5 years ago
Pat was a "boy wonder" at Intel and could do no wrong — until Larrabee. I was working at Intel at the time and remember always assuming that Pat would someday be CEO. His departure came as such a shock to a lot of us, as does his return.

He might have what it takes to turn Intel around.

Comment · 6 years ago
A soft core is a CPU that is programmed into an FPGA instead of a "regular" core that is made of discrete components.
Comment · 7 years ago
If refurbishers were able to bypass the activation lock, what would the point of an activation lock be in the first place? This is perhaps one of the most important use cases, and it's a good sign that iFixit is complaining about it.
Comment · 8 years ago
Calories and can be converted to Joules. The amount of energy to run a computer (a human computer or a physical one) is interesting to me personally, as is comparing the amount of extra calories (and thus, extra emissions) it costs me to ride my bike 20 miles to work vs. driving a gasoline car.
Comment · 8 years ago
Actually, Silverthorne (the first Atom CPU) added MOVBE.
Comment · 9 years ago
Incidentally, Steelcase CEO Jim Hackett quoted in this article was just named CEO of Ford.
Comment · 9 years ago
Comment · 11 years ago

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton