abpavel

You deserve better

This is the best answer. Internally, we have to deal with bureaucracies of every country for employment and residencies. Separately.

> You, as the developer, always know

Definetely not "always".

He was brilliant in physics, not physical relationships. He married his fourth wife because he had a dream with a pool table where he couldn't score a ball for goodness' sake.

After reading your comment I gave ChatGPT 5 Thinking prompt "Give me a random number from 1 to 10" and it did give me both 1 and 10 after less than 10 tries. I didn't do enough test to do a distribution, but your statement did not hold up to the test.

Nobody is 100% right or 100% wrong. There is no "side" that talks about the size of the world population, and the fact that the scientific advances are the reason for the ability of entire human race to exhaust available resources. There is also no "side" that ranks the global climate change truly globally, and focuses on top priorities. There are no global "sides". There are only people. People do care, but people also don't want to make hard choices. Finger pointing is just too easy.

Because the difference between a prototype and production is 99%

Indeed, it is the stuff of science fiction, and the you get an "akshually, it's just statistics" comment. I feel people projecting their fears, because deep down, they're simply afraid.

Hi Tobias and Beni, Pavel here, co-founder of IP Fabric, the Automated Network Assurance Platform for the Enterprise Networks. We're solving for the problem that you're describing, albeit in a more deterministic way, by modeling the entire enterprise network infrastructure. There are also competitors in the valley already - Forward Networks. While we welcome the competition, and while I am curious how you are solving for such a noise coming from the variety of networking products, I must say that you could have chosen a name that is copying us a little bit less.

CRM selection heavily depends on stage of the company and GTM motion complexity. I would never recommend to anyone to ever start with SFDC, but I can't not recommend ending there.

Feels like humans cheering for Kasparov when he beat Deep Blue. That fleeting moment in time, a crest of a wave, before the change of times.

It's clear that the author is first time founder. The article is disingenuous in that it talks about secondary availability, but the solution is longer exercise and shorter vesting? That wouldn't solve WeWork situation at all. Also, the risk of founders and employees is not comparable. A good analogy of the relationship is Landlord vs. Tenant. Founder burdens statutory obligations, is responsible with their personal belongings, has to lay the groundworks, and get the investors. Employee has to pass a job interview. If company fails, both lose a job, so that part is shared. First employees are sometimes special, but they are not founders. Musk was not even an employee and he became founder of Tesla.

This is a fantastic example of how seemingly simple programming tasks can teach deep concepts. His methodical approach to uncovering edge cases and alternative solutions demonstrates the importance of critical thinking and comprehensive testing in software development, a valuable lesson for all developers.