aacid

revolution, that is only option. yes, it may look overly optimistic and rosy tinted but what is the other option? be overly pessimistic, concluding that the rich won and we lost and just wait for the inevitable end?

most countries around the world still have democracy, so voting the the solution. what I don't know is how to fight populism... because that is the achilles heel of democracy... for now, spreading the knowledge is probably all we can do, people have to (and will in time) learn who can be trusted and who cannot.

but honestly I don't buy into sci-fi "AI will kill us all or enslave us" premise. that is only our anthropomorphisation of the artificial intelligence. what I see as more probably that AI could rule us in stead of the human politics that rule us now. why not have LLM political parties that could be voted? each one with open weights and transparent prompts? without emotion, corruption and greed? wouldn't that be better than current situation?

no, you don't. books are really cheap, libraries are everywhere. and you can also travel cheap, people backpack all around the world every day. sure you will still need some money, but certainly not "few hundred million dollars", that is way overblown...

if you consider every single person that uses some LLM then sure, it is tiny percentage, but I would wage that large percentage don't write technical documentation as GP. large userbase probably don't need THE best solution for their use case and will be comfortable with A solution that is within their budget. so for them simple luna < terra < sol < astra would suffice.

but if you want to use some LLM agent for anything commercial and you want to get the best and at the same time you don't want to overpay the easiest and the surest would be to create your own benchmark for your specific use case.

Art is subjective, you not liking it doesn't mean it is bad. You just do not like it and that is ok.

sure, that is true, but that is what I'm saying. if AI will take over intellectual work and robots manual work (in the future) then our current system will have no other option than completely change.

sorry I honestly don't understand what you meant (english is not my first language). do you imply that person needs few hundred million dollars to live? because if so I don't agree, you really don't need that much money to be happy. sure I'm living a comfortable life from money I earn, but I could live will far far less money and still be happy.

and what is problem with that? isn't it 100x better than just an idea? it is opensource, it's a nice proof of concept that can be built on.

The meaning you're looking for is living, enjoying life. We already have more books anyone could ever read in a lifetime. Same with movies, tv shows, documents or games. You have whole planet to travel around and explore. You have few billions of humans you can interact and socialize with... I really do not understand why so many people are afraid of not working... meaning of my life was never to work for someone, that was always only means to finance my life.

I has no idea about the latin word cacare... In Slovak "to poop" is kakat...

The premise is clear, is one agent can do what developer can, but quicker, why not speed up the whole workflow to match it?

Do you have any official guidelines what jokes are people allowed to funny and which are not?

New car is always a big investment, second hand is the way. 25k car will be even cheaper in few years.

Sure, give me an app that communicated directly with the car without the need to through manufacturers cloud and I'll be fine with it.

Yrs; that is what world needs, complete dependency on one giga corporation... I cannot wait for it to happen!

ADHD is not a disease; it is disorder. People with ADHD are differently wired in their brain, you cannot cure it like you can disease.