_x11l
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
I was stating we have enough of it as is. No need to be snarky when you couldn’t be bothered to read. Of course it exists, what kind of troglodyte do you take me as, sir?!
I guess I am curious what the legal reasoning is behind them skirting it is.
All that said, I will just admit that I am upset with RHEL and need to do some more research into the GPL.
And “mostly sponsored” is just another way of saying sponsored. Just because you sponsor something does not mean you own it. It does not really give you many rights as I understand. Because you are a sponsor, not an investor.
You make the argument for GCC but that is a piece of GNU which I feel furthers my point. Cool, RHEL put some money into an already free and open piece of software… that makes them exempt from violating the GPL?
edit: Stallman, any thoughts?
Also, bravo to that dev. Seriously, v0.0.2 and you are killing it mate. You should be proud.