_qhtn

> Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"),[1] short for argumentum ad hominem, typically refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.

You failed at the "genuine discussion" part by citing pop econ horseshit.

Comment · 7 years ago

Thank you for the last bit about Freakonomics- it lets everyone know it's safe to ignore you.

Comment · 7 years ago

No, no one above "director" is doing shit, if that.

The customers are paying for it, if only in future higher prices.

Wipe that polish off your face before speaking bootlicker.

Comment · 7 years ago

> They're flying

Grunts are, the executive staff, directors, and share holders ain't doin' shit.

Comment · 7 years ago

If any profit goes to the employees, I'm on board.

Comment · 7 years ago

> 2,3,4) A judge could reasonably find that you were attempting to circumvent the law and declare all of these as “bot”.

Unless you were disabled and using assistive technology.

Comment · 7 years ago

Add 2018 to the title please.