Recent submissions

Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
I 100% agree with you. You absolutely "can't resolve this kind of debate by simply saying "foreign bad" or "foreign good"

Imagine we discover an alien planet with no predators. Should we allow ecological merging, with reasonable expectation of large biodiversity loss. The problem is, the alien planet doesn't have a pesticides industry propped up around saying "foreign bad"

But I have no idea, and am not qualified to answer that hypothetical.

Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
I've referenced articles and books in my other comments, and you're calling it myth. Care to cite something that supports what you claim?
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Kind of, the idea is that no species would be invasive if we didn't create the ideal place for it to thrive. Invasives mostly thrive in disturbed areas and don't actually displace natives. The book I referenced goes into way more details, but in most cases invasives actually help repair damaged ecosystems. They are often pioneer species in the disturbed areas.
Comment · 4 years ago
The bugs are not at fault here. The people who created the environment for them to thrive are.

Edit After Downvote: I get it - They were a major nuisance to you. Lanternflys weren't a one time thing. This has happened before - remember stink bugs? This has happened many times and it is going to get worse. Please don't shoot the messenger.

Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Does this have anything to do with GraphQL or developers just not understanding security and role/authorization?
Comment · 4 years ago
Totally. But not in software.

Take a look at Code Complete: Chapter 25. Does a way better job explaining this than I could in a comment box.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton