Recent submissions

Comment · 10 years ago
You know, it makes sense to me that increasing supply should drive down demand and hence prices. But I frankly don't care.

The entire piece reads like an excuse to not do things for the poor. How about we actually do things FOR THE POOR instead of tossing them scraps from the tables of the rich?

Comment · 10 years ago
I'd take fewer people online in general. The number of people that are glued to their smartphones because of all this supposed progress frightens me.
Comment · 10 years ago
As a crotchety old timer, I agree completely.
Comment · 10 years ago
Neither can they ;)
Comment · 10 years ago
You're absolutely correct. The cost of my AWS deployment in service of my personal email, and less than 5 other people comes in at ~$5.06/mo. The time, however, is the real cost. If/when I gain significant users, Fastmail would be at the top of my list of companies to consider.
Comment · 10 years ago
I think it's important to note that, for the most part, both patriotism and religion need to be deeply ingrained in a person at a very young age for them to defend either so blindly.

US families take care of the religious aspect; US public school take care of the patriotism. If you weren't of the age where you simply don't question what you're told yet, I believe (perhaps hope?) both of these would die out in a few generations.

Comment · 10 years ago
EC2 blocks/throttles outgoing SMTP by default.

As with so many things in AWS, it's left up to the customer to inform AWS that a) you're running a mail server, b) what the purpose/use case is and c) request they configure the reverse lookup associated with the elastic IP you've allocated.

Source: I've been running public facing SMTP servers in EC2 for years with no issues.

Comment · 10 years ago
Comment · 10 years ago
> There's a reason that these alternatives are winning.

Yes, and that reason is that the current crop of up-and-coming developers have the same problem as past generations: They'd prefer to implement their own solutions vs. looking to the past.

Slack just happens to be the current darling in group communication. At some point, someone will make something that will change the fad-diet to The Next Big Thing.

Comment · 10 years ago
My advice here is straightforward: fuggedaboutit.

Adults curse; sometimes too much. It makes them look stupid, too. But there's no need to be both annoyed and offended. Be annoyed, sure, but then perhaps consider that you're simply a better person. Consider, too, that going to HR over something like this _will_ make you enemies.

Finally, consider just how much care and feeding that moral high-horse costs you, in emotional and mental energy.

Just let it go!

Comment · 11 years ago
> it never had any deep emotional or cultural impact to those who saw it in the first place.

How could you possibly know what had a deep emotional impact on anyone other than yourself or possibly the people you interact with most closely in life?

Here's an alternate proposal for you: You've grown as a person, and all the deep emotional impacts that music might be able to make on you have been made. To those still growing, you aren't able to assess the impact, because you now view the world through the eyes of an adult.

Give it 30 years, and watch as all these things come back again into pop-culture because those kids from today will be in your shoes, as decision makers at TV/Internet/Whatever companies that push pop-culture -- being guided by their own sense of nostalgia about the things that impacted them as kids.

Comment · 11 years ago
The paradox is that IMO the simplest way forward is...

I feel like this statement is the crux of the issue. Have you considered that your opinion is simply wrong?

Comment · 11 years ago
s/Customer/Citizen/ and you've hit on a large portion of the problem with representative democracy.
Comment · 11 years ago
What do they fear? A public relations nightmare? Because they sure as hell aren't going to go to jail for any of this. Neither the Justice Dept. officials, nor the Judge authorizing this, nor the police carrying it out will have to deal with any negative consequences as a result. The USA is a nearly-complete police state, after all.
Comment · 11 years ago
> I don't understand why the US allows it, and it screams of corruption/bribery/etc.

Seems to me like you understand it completely. The US is, like most countries, mired in a bit of corruption/bribery/etc. I am of the opinion this is simply part of the human condition, and is virtually impossible to eliminate.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton