Recent submissions

Comment · 11 days ago
Doesn't this necessitate installing a malicious python module, which is pretty unlikely unless a supply chain attack occurs right?
Comment · 15 days ago
It would be really interesting to see if incest goes down after this using now as a baseline...
Comment · 28 days ago
Seeing lots of content on the web about pangram's unreliability
Comment · 1 month ago
Trying to be a little less negative than the guy that got flagged, I too don't understand the motivation behind these projects. I've seen a hundred of them at this point- and each of them is probably worse and has less learning value than the one Andrej Karpathy made to teach people the building blocks involved in a GPT

So, why do people keep making these? Asking genuinely

Comment · 1 month ago
Are there days when you forget to apply your framework or you feel lazy and cheat/shortcut parts/all of the framework?
Comment · 1 month ago
would you share a bit about the style of the code reviews and how its initiated? im trying to build something similar for my company
Comment · 2 months ago
I love Eric. He is up next for sure.
Comment · 2 months ago
I'm really skeptical you can ship ~10 PRs a day per person unless these PRs are tiny pieces of one feature or all of them are tiny bugs that are each a 3 line fix that you could review instantly. Otherwise how can you confirm that the AI even did the right fix or feature correctly? That you even wanted that feature done that way?
Comment · 2 months ago
How does it compare performance wise? Feature parity? Can you spawn shells in the terminal pane or is there no terminal pane and you're expected to being your own multiplexer?
Comment · 2 months ago
you get used to it almost instantly like within 1 hour of use. But I also have the OnePlus Open which has probably the best hidden crease you can buy besides Oppo which is just the company OnePlus came from
Comment · 2 months ago
I've taken my OnePlus Open to the beach and it was fine. Multiple times. I don't use any case for my phone
Comment · 2 months ago
Isn't it wasteful to have everyone go off and remake the same software with slightly different bugs in it instead of one that fixes almost all of the bugs
Comment · 2 months ago
Yeah even if the software is good there's just something sad about realizing you're reading AI generated text. Even if its proofread and factually correct it just comes across as cheap and low effort, moreso when the content gets duplicated in a pointless FAQ that just restates everything you just read
Comment · 2 months ago
Yes I filed a support ticket with them and explained that their system is broken and they just did not care. I explained how it was impossible for me to use it 3 times already as I've only made 2 chatgpt accounts EVER, and only recalling entering my phone number for one of the two chatgpt accounts. I told them that this issue locked me out of codex and chatgpt for work and they weren't willing to do anything about it. Totally useless support.

I ended up borrowing my gf's phone number just so I could get access for work. Ridiculous

Comment · 2 months ago
Hope to be a part of this someday...

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton