ZainRiz
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
If you look at value as purely the LLM output, then there's a valid argument that the best frontier models will always be better than fine tuned specialists. (I'm not convinced personally, but it's a defensible claim)
But that misses two dimensions: 1. The cost of acquiring that output 2. What is actually "good enough" for that specialist domain
Not every output needs to be the best to produce value.
And as specialist models increase in cost, their cost/value proposition goes down.
At some point, there's a threshold where cheaper, fine tuned models are "good enough" at the task and also substantially cheaper than the expert models.
That's where fine tuning helps.
Personally, I became a believer in fine tuning after fine tuning a 1B Qwen model as a second pass over my local voice transcription app, achieving excellent accuracy at ~zero token cost and waaaay lower latency than if I'd invoked my Claude subscription under the hood.
> imagine what happens to NYC when all the people doing the menial work keeping the city alive (have to) move away? Whoops, now everyone is going to drown in trash and feces!
That's not a "the poor middle class folks in NYC need help" story, that's a "the rich folks of NYC need folks to serve them" story. They're welcome to strategize however they like to incentivize people working there. Manipulative heartstring tug are not welcome however.
I've been using "resume" this whole time
Any plans to come out with a version I don't have to worry about getting wet?
Case insensitive, of course
In 2018, the template for this "One-pager" was two pages long
On top of that, most of their products are software running on your desktop and will still keep working after EOL
And if you're a government or enterprise with spectacularly big wallets, you can choose to pay Microsoft big $$ to keep shipping you additional security patches
Still...
The thing I'm the proudest about...
Is that time I opened a jammed coaxial cable with nothing but two butter knives.
It attacks claims made by some simple lay people, based on their half-baked understanding of their own faiths (which they never really dug into). However, people well versed in the religion don't actually make any such claims.
The arguments being debunked are ones that religious scholars themselves would have disagreed with. Such misrepresentations don't guide anyone
All view points (and mistakes) I post are my own and not from my employer
Blog: www.zainrizvi.io