Xmd5a
Joined 1 year ago
Joined 1 year ago
Think of it as reversible incremental ranking with information-theoretic guarantees and updates that scale linearly with the number of items to rank. From this I realized there was a direct application in machine learning: differential sorting and ranking. I've been exploring this space for the past couple days and it seems I could be flirting with state of the art performances. To sort 8000 items, softsort takes 1.9 secs to complete one forward and one backward pass. My implementation takes 27ms. 488Mo for softsort. 0.18Mo for me. Sorting 10^6 items costs about 100ms and 15Mo. Softsort can't run at this scale. Alas softsort isn't SOTA, fastsoftsort is. We both run in O(n log n) in time and O(n) in space, and have very similar raw performance profiles except that my thing takes 3x as much memory ... which allows me to update the ranking in linear time on the next runs. Mmmh!
Well the next step obviously is to get in touch with the lodge these police officers belong to, talk to the grandmaster and convince him to organize a conciliation night with you as a guest. When you leave, whisper in the ear of the officer in charge of your case "I'm hungry, and I only use pressure cookers. If you behave I'll invite you to the diner".
> RDJ: It's because I finished making a studio in Scotland that I'd been building for about three years. It took so long. I had this engineer helping me wire all the patch bays together, and he was doing it for about three months, every day, and then he realized he was doing it all wrong and had to start again. That was pretty brutal. So it's kind of like, “OK, I've done that now, it's the end of an era.”
> But then I realized I actually like making studios more than making music, because I like the possibilities of what you can do. I make these setups that will achieve some sort of purpose, so the way I've wired it together becomes the track in itself.
https://pitchfork.com/features/cover-story/9506-strange-visi...
vs
c'est un docteur
Ahaha. Flowers are the way to go.
https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0009007
> Occam's Razor as a Formal Basis for a Physical Theory
> We introduce the principle of Occam's Razor in a form which can be used as a basis for economical formulations of physics. This allows us to explain the general structure of the Lagrangian for a composite physical system, as well as some other artificial postulates behind the variational formulations of physical laws. As an example, we derive Hamilton's principle of stationary action together with the Lagrangians for the cases of Newtonian mechanics, relativistic mechanics and a relativistic particle in an external gravitational field.
It's not. You figure this out when you drag someone into the woods. And again a couple weeks later.