Xeamek

if baby is 100% US citizen then how is that an 'illegal immigrant'? Again, you may call them 'unwanted', and you have right to such opinion. But law is what is written, if they got citizenship then they aren't illegal

People who abuse birthright citizenships are, by definitions, not illegal immigrants. But even if you count all of them as 'unwanted' immigrants - how many % of total immigration to the US is result of those birthright laws?

probably to highlight how this isn't genuine account?

core (as in kernel) is running linux kernel which is C, yes.

But java is not 'just UI' - majority of user space apps run java (or jvm, to be precise), as well as tons of system services, to the point where you can't actually do a lot of android API calls from native code, because a lot of logic is written in java(or kotlin) code, and not just java being wrapper around native code.

Not to mention him saying no one writes java anymore when it literally powers world's most popular OS (android) and double digit percentage of internet backends

What if the enemy won't allow for your surrender and just want to kill you regardless?

What's the point of hypethotical then?

So just borders?

In the end, it’s the people who fight that determine if the thing they are fighting for is worth their lives. Dying for some lines on the map sounds bad, but if it were only lines on the map, then the people probably wouldn't choose to die for them, would they?

Nobody wants to die, but if someone is ready to give up their life for some cause, then who are you to tell them they can't?

It's the fate of Ukrainians that is at stake and its the Ukrainians that determine if changing that fate is worth the costs of their lives.

Depends on specific boundaries, but literally all of human history is about fighting for people's rights to hold one boundary or another

Who led the coup in "your" country?

You know what hypothetical question is?

Really? Even if that would result with your new living conditions to be literally North Korea style or the worst of islamic terrorist state?

So when your country will be attacked you will give up your lands and your freedoms just for sake of "less people dying"?

Post specific or shut up, because this is just spewing bullshit with some true bits sprinkled on top for the sake of deniability.

>But in the end he didn't end Democracy, he let the democratic procedures take place, a fascist wouldn't do that.

Fascist wouldn't fail?

Again, You know Hitler literally tried a coup, failed and then switched to 'democratic' means?