WiSaGaN

They will write "research" articles that demonstrate it's possible to plant bad stuff inside open weights model. Or probably already did it?

It's fascinating that this kind of bug is exactly you can't really avoid even when rust is supposedly to guard against. Rust mitigated this problem a lot in practice, but you can never be certain because of issues like this in practice. This is similar that a math proof that's already been peer reviewed and accepted as truth, may still be possible to be wrong, although the chance is very small but it's not zero. Epseicially when the complexity gets higher.

isn't this only counting russian origin already?

Deepseek v4.1 flash is my baseline model to use at original provider's api. The issue is, for my personal use, it's cheap enough that i don't need it to go cheaper compare to the time I spent using it. And it's already a very capable model in dealing everyday simple things. For sure, for research level questions or large scale coding projects, I would want to use frontier model. But more and more daily tasks can be done now just using pi with deepseek api directly without thinking about much.

This is with the unreleased model, which is probably significantly larger (thus costlier) than astra.

This is definitely not on par with GPT-6 astra. Not with GPT-5.6 sol either. But probably will set as a new baseline for modern API based LLM because it's so cheap.

It's one of the things you need to do if you want your company to later become the only company in the world. They also promised that they would treat you nicely afterwards after they get what they want.

You probably meant Qwen3.8-35B-A3B. But judging from some of the words from their team, it seems unlikely unfortunately.

That would've been a very strange arrangement.

It's unlikely HugginFace colluded given they specifically cited they used open models to save them from the hacking.

My guess is that they will later "reveal" some "violations" but provide little evidence citing proprietary algorithm.

Top startups in China publish a lot?

I assume this is done with the help of AI? I have done similar vibe project that explaining catastrophic forgetting with the help of AI. It's just so satisfying now that if you really want to learn something, you can always do it with the help of AI. Before, it's hard to find good resources, now it's not a problem, the issue now becomes one's own focus and agency.

U.S. policymakers believe that even if the gap is small—like six months to a year—whoever reaches AGI first (whatever that means) could gain such an overwhelming advantage over their perceived adversary that it would effectively kneecap them. (You can look at the kinds of things they mention—cyber, WMDs—to get a sense of what they mean.) Jensen Huang disagrees and has said AI is a marathon.