WhatIsDukkha

If your proceduralism doesn't generate easy to hard solvable problems (ie from geometry constraints etc), its not really adding to the gameplay, only the visual experience.

You should start a timer every time you get into the car.

For most Americans it might add up to 7-10 hours a week or more.

That's a lot even over a few weeks.

That's not time walking with your kids or dog sniffing the flowers, that's the opposite.

The US has very low standards for its lifestyle.

We're told we are number ONE in everything but in fact its usually 40 or 20 when you actually go look at things that matter.

We never really notice because we think filling a big house in the suburbs with garbage from Costco is living the dream.

Thats not on htmx to decide what html to resend that's your engineering work...

Aider for me

Very successful by just being careful and walking it forward.

Yes its about 2 years, August 2024 from git it looks like.

Everyone has a lot of "feelings" about their llm model.

No prompts/promptchain/context provided.

No model provided.

No attempt to show how to reproduce the issue.

No attempt at even confirming it themselves.

Just feelings.

and now a thread full of more feelings from others.

Saruman was already rotted by lust for the ring when he began to use the Palantir and then came into the presence of a dominating and corrupting will.

So yeah... plenty of real world versions of that.

Yes exactly.

They make a constructive IP assertion with the watermark claim of origin that persists across mutation. (ie the "artist" signs their work)

They then quitclaim the IP assertion via TOS.

These are not equivalent rights and reversions though and now you have an IP encumbered and weird legal state because of the DRM.

I don't actually care about AI images?

Most people put so little effort into prompting them that they come out statistically "average" which makes them blatantly ugly.

Most of them are pretty bad just like 90% of everything is bad. Humans create bad art all day long too.

I gave a specific example of a making a texture for a videogame? How does that change what you actually said to me very specifically despite maybe not reading what I said?

To the extent that I'm upset its at peoples capitulation at this DRM nonsense over being overly reactive to ... internet images which dont matter.

Lmao I said that in my original post, lmao not that hard to read.

Against MILLLIONS of legitimate uses which you don't seem to care to protect?

You should also think about whether, suddenly, courts can now trust images they see because this technology exists?

I think thats not even basically plausible.

Yes I did read it years ago and again today?

If you read my original point you'd see I said "weird DRM glorp" which you and other have tried, and failed to only closely parse "DRM" so that you could nitpick poorly.

It is integral and part of DRM systems and certainly "weird DRM glorp" for an actual close reader.

DRM is not just "I cant watch X movie because DRM" even if that is the statistically prevalent understanding of DRM.

Its a suite of technologies of which watermarking is one of.

You are asserting that the existence of metadata in other venues to be proof that this form of watermarking metadata is just fine with you and should be for everyone else because... nope don't see any reason listed here.

I have an IP address so therefore this is all fine?

"Every accusation is a confession" also seems like an insinuation that I have something to hide but you have "nothing to hide, nothing to fear"ie the very generic privacy right fallacy.

As for "vibes driven"... this whole technical "fix" is a result of the reactionary "vibe" of the ai moral panic, your "notes" don't seem to be providing any perspective there?

You are making a category error --

"this image made by OpenAI" is a drm assertion

You wont be able to assert copyright of the picture that you added an OpenAI red bowtie to, thats a DRM issue.