Virax
Joined 17 years ago
Joined 17 years ago
Two months later I was hired for what turned out to be an excellent software development position at a completely different organization.
When I interview technical candidates, I ask a pair of related questions that encompass data structures, sorting, and time complexity. It is a very simple-sounding problem. The good candidates get the questions almost before I finish asking, and the mediocre candidates struggle.
http://reason.com/archives/2006/03/01/why-poor-countries-are...
it really blows your mind. I think the nay-sayers are missing the point of this article - it doesn't matter if you are sympathetic to the family. You have to remember that the higher paying job isn't creating 2x the economic output - her choice to take the lower paying job means that:
There is one fewer position making $120K
There is one more position making $60K
Now consider this: the $120K position is much more likely to be a management position, which, if done well, could create several $60K positions, lets say 3. This means that for the economy as a whole, there is one less $120K position and TWO fewer $60K positions.
In my opinion this is very scary.
DOUG: When is Joe's flight due it?
YOU: Why do you ask?
DOUG: Oh... umm... there's a seminar at 3:30 PM I thought he would be interested in.
YOU: What seminar?
DOUG: The underlying physics of the violin.
YOU: Why do you think he would be interested in that?
DOUG: We talked about it once.
YOU: So, just because you talked about it once, you think he would be interested in spending time going to your hoity-toity physics seminar?
DOUG: Um, yeah, I do, and it isn't hoity---
YOU: Oh yes, the fluctuations of the harmonic oscillators will exponentially dampen the transverse waves of the vibrating string...
DOUG: Dude, shut the hell up. First off, that's nonsense, second off, we don't talk like that, and THIRD, you STILL haven't answered---
YOU (sarcastically): Oh, oh, I'm so so sorry, I haven't answered you question yet have you.
DOUG (gritting teeth): No, I just want to know when he will be arriving.
YOU: I have no idea, check the fucking monitors.
DOUG: WE AREN'T AT THE AIRPORT!
YOU: Yeah, I know, I'm just fucking with you, he arrives at 3:00. He won't make it to your seminar, and in my oh-so-humble opinion, he wouldn't want to go to your seminar anyway. Joe's a real man.
DOUG: FFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUU%$#!^%$@$%^!
I find it quite difficult to believe that a chef with 10 years of experience could not find a job in Seattle. This beggars belief.
In short, don't tempt economic fate when you have a wife and kid and live in the USA - you should not count on ANY social support in this country.
I strongly suspect that investors who change to be pitched are in fact scam artists who do just enough investment to plausibly deny that they are in fact scam artists while taking in huge amounts of cash from ignorant start-ups and forcing the start-ups that do agree to receive investment into contracts that strongly favor the investors.
I'm sorry, but charging to pitch fails the common sense test; it is little more than a way of separating fools from their money.
ARE YOU F'ING KIDDING ME? You write a blog post on hiring and then proceed to relate a story about how you escalated a personal conflict way beyond reason? This is precisely the kind of guy you don't want on your team, because working in the real world involves resolving personal conflict without needlessly pissing people off.
(1999+) But now I've taken my leave of that whole sick,
navel-gazing mess we called the software
industry. Now I'm in a more honest line of
work: now I sell beer.
So, I suppose, Joel is right, in a roundabout way:Selling beer => flirtation => sex => sperm + egg = Building a future human being!
But seriously, Joel is on crack.
You have no idea why your startup failed. It has relatively little to do with the things you listed.
Your startup failed because you named it "trogger".
The name of a product, technology, website, whatever is critical for success. The name "trogger" makes me think of "troglodyte" or "troll blogger". Seriously, this is one of the worst names for anything internet or technology-related that anyone could possibly come up with.
Please please please make sure that someone else chooses the name of the next startup you work on.