V-eHGsd_

honestly you're probably right. I read the post assuming it was going to be about some exciting llm backed research into flight characteristics but it looked like it was written by an llm, or at least an llm turning notes into a blog post, "these are the packages I installed, these are the engine characteristics, these are the way points .. ", etc.

and this would work in real life too, if only we could all climb and descend entirely at pilot's discretion, direct enter enter and never have to worry about all of the other planes doing the exact same thing.

You _used_ to be able to indict a ham sandwich anyway. These days the federal government can’t even manage to indict someone caught on video throwing a hand sandwich at law enforcement.

oh man, I referred back to your blog post when I wrote the ssh certificate authority for $job ... ~10 years ago.

Thank for writing it!

indeed, and this is unironically cited by the "shall not be infringed" crowd as a reason that they should be allowed to bring guns anywhere and everywhere, potentially turning any movie theater disagreement or minor road annoyance (or traffic stop, to bring this back to the police) into a violent life ending incident. to quote jwz out of context, "now you have two problems".

Two companies that aren’t currently being run by people throwing nazi salutes; great choices.

You had me up until “we take full responsibility”. This administration is much more about darvo response when they’re caught doing something wrong.

While true, I believe op was talking about with respect to the protections afforded by the law.

Wouldn’t it be horrible if the United States were a dependable ally?

back when orkut was a thing, google did this one weekend with internal employees. some co-workers participated; unsurprisingly they all said it was _very_ disturbing.

it's not a defense because despite your efforts to antagonize, I don't need to defend myself.

i'm over our little interaction. cheers.

it's not a "defense". i'm saying your reply is weirdly bombastic and generally incoherent.

this reads like an LLM generated argument. it's totally incoherent and has almost nothing to do with what's being discussed.

cheers, friend.

> but proceeded to try to lock up Trump for the entire period of 2021-2024.

that's a very strange/partisan way to say that they tried to hold him legally accountable for his actions.