TrnsltLife
Joined 3 years ago
Joined 3 years ago
But I agree we shouldn't be using robot dogs for this. They should be reserved for tracking down and destroying banned books.
They should both go home to their wives who surely have their cookies ready along with a pair of slippers and a backrub.
Now that women are back out of the workforce, there's enough money for the blue collar worker and the immigrant. I hear the 2050s are gonna be a 1950s paradise but with better technology. Here's hoping.
Far worse and more consequential was the government-urged censorship on any open discussion of COVID, vaccines, origins, etc. during and after the pandemic.
How many people will be hurt because of idiotic AI responses like this?
Just like AI shouldn't counsel someone to end their own life, it also shouldn't counsel people to end their relationships, their careers, and so on.
China probably looks at these people as a good reason why they have to keep going no matter what.
Maybe we need a new pronoun for it. 2nd person inanimate. YOU -> YAI?
This week I was experimenting with leaving out "you" pronouns by changing everything to passive/subjunctive and leaving out the subject.
E.g. when referring to something the AI has written or done: The code that was written... Instead of: The code you wrote.
For something I want it to do: May the code be modified to include the following constraints... Instead of: Modify the code to include the following constraints
I don't know if that's really helpful but it's good to be cognizant I'm not really talking to anyone.