Tractor8626

This particular quote doesn't make any sense. This is not what "backward compatibility" means. Is there a bug or does it just do thing differently so benchmark is not "fair"?

I agree what you have to think. But example is kind bad.

We got strictly better version of application for cheap. What is there even to complain about?

Unless your frontend can be used instead of claude desktop you didn't built better claude desktop. You built something different.

I didn't said what you can't. I said you didn't.

There is one requirement which is more important than performance: Software should exist in reality, not in imagination.

You could dream all you want about how you would write better version of claude desktop. Fact is: you didn't. And you never will.

As user I would appreciate useful and quality software. Not artistic one.

Those software artists happy to implement happy path. When all data valid, no errors happening, user behave as expected.

Real useful code is ugly and complicated. Complete opposite of artistic.

So what? Do author thinks those people have skills or resources to do better?

Supported provider list is nowhere close to pi's or opencode's

Ai can't use any api out of box. It requires thing called "harness" to use anything.

Agent doesn't have api key to access service directly

Just elect correct politicians doh

> I don't know how to make debs and rpms

There is tool called nfpm for easy package creation.

To claim "highest revenue" you need to compare with other companies not with itself in the past...

Maybe your magic ipv6 configures everything.

My have certain shortcomings: it doesn't assign dns names to hosts and doesn't configure firewall rules

Yeah. ULA and nat66 would work nicely. Except you would get murdered for asking about nat66.

How do you setup dynamic dns in your network? Which software do you use?