ToothlessJake
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
SAIC fills the monitoring center fused with fusion center niche with their "Domain Awareness Center[3]" being built in Oakland California. DEA uses the NSA who pulls data from all the various private/government/corporate/infiltrated databases to forge investigation paths, aka "intel laundering[4]".
FBI assists in private digital forensics centers[5] run by Snowden's Booz Allen Hamilton which help all levels of law enforcement in things like intellectual and copyright prosecutions[6].
Endgame Systems uses illegal exploits and data harvested from botnets against whoever for a cool million or so at the whim of the NSA/others[7] while hackers come under further prosecution and filtering for their esoteric deeds[8].
All the while SAIC[9] managed drones continue to spread across the US[10] and elsewhere.
Monolithic by choice, the whole lot.
I would honestly appreciate those affiliated with ATT, Comcast, Blue Coat, Endgame, Booz, Hunton & Williams and others to halt their profiteering endeavors. This of course should apply to all functionaries of the various arms of the world's governments that are complying in exchange for their salary as well.
[1] http://www.alanco.com/news_040104.asp
[2] http://www.dhs.gov/fusion-centers-and-joint-terrorism-task-f...
[3] http://oaklandwiki.org/Domain_Awareness_Center
[4] http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/07/us-dea-irs-idUSBRE...
[5] http://whois.net/whois/chicagorcfl.org
[7] http://wiki.echelon2.org/wiki/Endgame_Systems
[8] http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-07/27/pornwall
[9] http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/06/14/news-saic-wins-95-mil...
[10] http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2013/08/coming_soon_t...
I would love to hear a thoughtful argument for how hiding the source of an investigation, including evidence used, is just under the letter of the law. Followed up with how 'overreaches' are bound to happen but are acceptable as long as results are shown(but evidence is not).
[1] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/cia-chief-w...
[2] http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/oct/10/supreme...
Edit: To the user below, this is various arms of the government passing around information amongst it's branches to avoid accountability and exposure as much as possible. Rather monolithic.
Keep the ready made mantras out of this please.
Is there anyone from this area around? Thanks to Parastoo[1] and Kingcope[2] I have gained some interest in how drones communicate(C/Ku Band) and who they operate with (SAIC[3]).
For those interested in partially decoding drone communications, particularly around where they are known to be operated in the US, it may be worthwhile to look into a setup like this[4]. It is a cheap $20usd-ish rtl-sdr tuner paired with a still cheaper 'Avenger' PLL LNB, allowing the operator to tune the cheap usb dongle into Ku band, which drones use out non-line of sight communications.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6038657
[2] http://privat.bahnhof.se/wb907234/pics/skygrab.pdf
[3] http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/06/14/news-saic-wins-95-mil...
[4] 'Crossband QSO, receiving EB5EA at 10GHz and transmitting EA5KGD on 432MHz. With SDR RTL2832U E4000 ("ezcap" stick) and PLL LNB ("Avenger" PLL321S-2), Digital KU Band Single LNBF' http://youtu.be/Sdmo-FtHtGU
It was not snide, but a historical reference. Sorry if you did not get it.
[1] http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/09/us-usa-court-telec...
All parties involved with be granted immunity, possibly retroactive, even though no wrong doing was found[2].
More payments to data providers will be given[3], not considered bribes. This is after issuing them said (retro)active immunity from attempts at legal recourse.
[1] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/cia-chief-w...
[2] http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/oct/10/supreme...
[3] http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/07/10/us-pays-companies-big...
Again from the JBIG2 wiki[1]:
"Textual regions are compressed as follows: the foreground pixels in the regions are grouped into symbols. A dictionary of symbols is then created and encoded.."
It seems not only is JBIG2 being deployed as OCR by Xerox for whatever reason, its implementation in this case is an absolute failure.
"Normal" is an overly aggressive compression setting? Is that an overly aggressive setting for the end-user or for Xerox to be implementing in their hardware marketed to law firms?
"Textual regions are compressed as follows: the foreground pixels in the regions are grouped into symbols. A dictionary of symbols is then created and encoded, typically also using context-dependent arithmetic coding, and the regions are encoded by describing which symbols appear where."
Then from the OCR wiki[2].
"Matrix matching involves comparing an image to a stored glyph on a pixel-by-pixel basis; it is also known as "pattern matching" or "pattern recognition"."
Furrow your brow and smash the down-vote arrow all you wish. It won't stop JBIG2 from doing much of what people consider OCR as doing today. Recognizing characters, just JBIG2 adds in making it's own dictionary which opened the path to this topic today.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JBIG2 [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_character_recognition
This seems a bit hair splitty when the end result is the same as invalid OCR dictionaries.