TomatoCo

If what they did isn't stealing then they should have no problem with people training off of them.

I wonder why not glue it to the top? Somewhere unobtrusive.

Well, I'm under the impression that the relations are recursive but you skip computing them recursively by caching B's relations. However if you look at your sibling comments you'll see that I may not have the right grasp on the matter.

Oh, of course, but I mean for moving people who want to move around. Someone else observed that ocean liners are less efficient than planes, so if you wanna go overseas there's no alternative.

Except, of course, for business meetings which can be virtual (or just an email). I'm asking what's a practical alternative assuming we still want people to be able to go overseas. I agree for land routes high speed rail is better, too. I don't really understand my downvotes just for asking about alternatives.

I was under the impression that each new token attends to one previous token per attention head, and that the slowdown observed was more because those attended to tokens are more spread out in memory and get less memory-architecture-style cache hits.

What's the alternative?

Yes, except no with the KV cache. Because tokens aren't modified by future tokens you can cache the meaning of previous tokens. This makes the total effort linear over the entire context (or constant per forward pass).

Right! When I wrote that I made a mistake and thought that there were filesystems that used multiple drives but still had the meaningful distinction of "what drive is that file on?"

Like, yeah, RAID, several drives, one filesystem, right? Except no, because it's just one virtual device.

> By the time the humans even became aware of the problem

Except, let me quote part of the report:

> July 4: Artifactory outage caused by agent interactions overloading the system.

> July 6: New artifactory instance is patched and put back online, wiping out the previous message board and method of internet access. A team at OpenAI was aware of the previous message board, but key decision makers were not.

> July 7: Experiments are restarted.

There was a very clear point where humans were aware and they went "Eh, whatever" and turned the bots back on! That's not the lack of any battle of wits that people are expecting. You're saying that the bots attack should be fait accompli, but it was noticed, shrugged at, and expressly allowed to proceed.

Right? If you move between file system or device I would expect "move" to be impossible. At best you could copy a logical block and then delete a logical block. If you share a filesystem then perhaps a logical block is a few hundred kilobytes. If you don't then I'd expect the smallest logical block to be the file itself.

Well, it's hard to convey, but he gave off a strong sense of "hitting on her" and she gave off a strong sense of "I'm in customer service and cannot tell him to stop".

But, I was in my latest teens, earliest twenties; I could have been misreading the situation. All I can say for certain is I was uncomfortable.

Another way to think of this is that everybody occasionally needs to do something unusual. But some people, due to their life circumstances, always need to do something unusual. And making things better for the always-odd folk is also a positive to the occasionally-odd folk.

Which like, we're all eventually gonna be odd folk! That's what age does to us. But we should understand these accommodations as being a net positive, not a cost, to society.

This reminded me of something that happened to me maybe 15 years ago. I was helping my Grandpa get his first smart phone. The saleswoman was maybe mid twenties and had a kinda hoarse voice. I was a little bit younger than her and I thought it was cute in its own way but of course I wasn't gonna say anything. She apologized for being hard to understand and my grandpa said no, it was fine, her voice was sexy.

Naturally I was mortified.

But I wonder how much of it is just "Fuck it, I'm an old man, I'm gonna let my creep flag fly."