Recent submissions

Comment · 9 months ago
Tokenizationnnnnnn
Comment · 9 months ago
It is really funny to me that in 2026 a coherent, grammatically correct response is assumed to be written by an AI. Oh how the tables have turned.
Comment · 9 months ago
Gdpeval
Comment · 9 months ago
How conveniently you forgot about the most impotant things for a product to make money - marketing and the network effect....
Comment · 9 months ago
the world does not need more shitware. We need medical advances, scientific breakthroughs and societal shift to improve wellbeing of all people. these things are much harderthan writing shitty sofware and we will need not the current AGIs(Goggle Gemini 3 Pro and ChatGPT 5.2 Thinking) but ASI to solve them.
Comment · 9 months ago
If cars do not have agency how useful are they going to be. If the Internet does not have agency how useful is going to be. if fire has no agency (debatable) how useful is going be.
Comment · 9 months ago
DO you have any idea of the man hours it took to build those large projects you are speaking of? Lets take Linux for example. Suppose for the sake of argument that Claude Code with Opus 4.5 is as smart as an average person(AGI), but with the added benefit that he can work 24/7. Suppose now i have millions of dollars to burn and am running 1000 such instances on max plans. Now if I have started running this agent since the date Claude Opus 4.5 was released and i prompted him to create a commercial-grade multi-platform OS from the caliber of Linux. An estimate of the linux kernel is 100 million man hours of work. divide by 1000. We expect to have a functioning OS like Linux by 2058 from these calcualtions. How long has claude been released? 2 months.
Comment · 9 months ago
Why do you assume AGI needs to have agency?
Comment · 10 months ago
Claude Code With Opus 4.5
Comment · 10 months ago
I agree but it is kinda strange that this model (Gemini 3 fast) achieved such a high score on ARC-AGI-2. Makes you wonder.
Comment · 10 months ago
I too noticed that Gemini is very reluctant to start spewing code directly, thats why I prompted it in such a specific manner to trigger the infinite loop. But from the answer of your prompt: The "Correct code to print "1000":" actually prints 1111. So yeah it is still wrong even for something super simple.
Comment · 10 months ago
I am sorry if it appears that it was written by AI - I wrote a draft and used AI to assist me since English, is not my first language. I asked it only to format but it has seemed to change the tone and the expressions too '.'
Comment · 10 months ago
Visibilty - i have no idea if there are censoring algorithms at play anywhere.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton