Taters91
Joined 4 years ago
Karma
95
Submissions
34
Member since
Jan 24
Joined 4 years ago
Also, they did not see it as a violation of their "economic freedom," as that concept was not really around in the 1700s. They objected to the violation of the British constitution, which meant their rights as British subjects were violated. Taxes were fine by them, as long as they had a voice in Parliament, which they did not have.