TapWaterBandit
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
https://www.thetimes.com/article/66dfc09e-c94a-4846-a4e2-60d...
I swear some Americans seem to think the world they live in is from 1955 or 1975 or something. The US is just one player amongst many, a very important one but by no means the paramount one for every country in the world. The idea it is simply isn't backed by facts on the ground.
So yea, if forced to choose between USA vs Rest of World virtually every country will choose RoW. Americans are delusional if they think they can just snap their fingers and everybody else will jump to attention.
No way is this true. Look at this list of countries by biggest trade partners (import & export) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_leading_t....
You really think countries will willing choose to trade with the USA over the rest of the world when it isn't the biggest destination for their exports nor their major source of imports? Why would they do that exactly?
This then has all sorts of flow on impacts throughout the manufacturing process and incentives inside the country.
Having a currency that is too strong for your economy always does this, look at the situation in European nations under the Euro.
Money is a very "efficient" market in this sense because each individual can decide do you want to hold currency X or currency Y or currency Z? And there are pros and cons to each that lead to price discovery between currencies. And I think as time goes on it is becoming more and more apparent that many central banks do not take the management of their countries currency seriously and so people choose alternatives. This is what well-functioning markets look like. Consumer choice and incentives.
And, of course, let's not discuss:
- tourism + air travel
- increasingly large cars far bigger than required from a utilitarian perspective
- luxury good production
- theme parks/fireworks displays
- cruise ships
Etc.
Bitcoin/crypto opposition is 95% pushed by embedded financial interests that will use any lever to protect their control over money and the power it gives them.
I work as a doordasher and have never once spoken to or interacted with anyone who works at the company.Well that's not quite true, I had an order with issues once that went to a CS rep in the Philippines who I chatted with via messaging.
For all intents and purposes my "boss" is a computer.
More that lawyers will hoard contracts but there will be financial incentives to defect early (the idea being to sell your contracts while the price is high).
Then that lawyer's contracts will become the mass-produced "good enough" boilerplate and be used widely driving down the value of hoarding contracts at all.
HN landed hard on the "sucks to be you" side of things with Musk, curious to see where this ends up.
> Last Friday, Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare released the results of an annual study of the number of homeless people *in the country’s parks and riverside areas.*
So this isn't the full count of homeless, just the ones living in specific park areas.
> But now I’m sitting on this cash, and like Matthew McConaughey says in wolf of Wall Street , they’re fucking addicted
Only point of contention is that when you have a currency experiencing sustained inflation over any medium/long term time horizon, it makes sense people would want to hold anything over than cash. Anyone who saved in cash (even using Term Deposits) from basically the 70s to today in any currency has had their purchasing power destroyed.