SupLockDef

Thinking that one or the other "side" isn't looking for control is quite refreshing to see.

So much hope in those youth innocence...

> The thing is: people quickly discover that even mediocre LLM-code with a mediocre LLM-review, is still better quality than what they hand wrote and hand-reviewed.

Emphasis mine.

I can't phantom some that bad at coding. Using such exaggeration void your comment.

Because it's well known that the data centers are essential for the survival of the species.

Now that we know that farms use a lot of water, we are clean to waste any lower amount of water.

Thank you!

The list of the greatest countries, always the same.

No worries, coding is solved they said in February 2026!

Isn't that a good news!

> Or basic software engineering and understanding of what memory safe means.

Wow my dude, let's talk about YOUR engineering understanding hahaha.

Go talk to your LLM, you better have to...

You have some kool-aid on your shirt, you should drink more carefully.

Probably Rust, that's always Rust with this kind of comments...

I am going to be called on that one, but I have to call on your bullshit here. You didn't write this.

I think the article is focusing on the shortcuts.

We know already what's happening after decade of optional thinking: electing dumass Presidents, walking the same path than Germany about 100 years ago, cut scientific research, social nets, etc.

We know already what's happening with optional thinking.

Emacs is SO bad,

That when I tried it, I was reading the best way to use it is to install plugins to make emacs behaves just like VIM.

In their first article of the series:

>I’m not a kernel expert—I’m learning out loud. The goal here isn’t a deep [...]

So I think it's safe to say they didn't contributed to the Linux kernel.

Why are you posting this if you know it is of poor quality then?

It's certainly not because you are proud of yourself, it has been generated.

So I genuinely wonder why?