Recent submissions

Comment · 12 years ago
ALOT of apps are starting to do this. I believe Snapchat initially was the company that began doing it. When a site like Facebook uses your number to identify you, this feature actually makes sense.

I wonder if more fine-grained permissions would make more sense for this sort of feature. Perhaps it would be better if Android had support for "This app may read text messages from 1-800-XXX-XXXX" or something similar instead.

Comment · 12 years ago
I agree! I found this version to be much easier for some reason. Possibly the brain is quicker to recognize and match the colours than when I'm forcing myself to look for numbers?
Comment · 12 years ago
It can, but they explicitly choose not to in Snapchat, afaik.
Comment · 12 years ago
I don't totally see the point to these arguments. The inherent nature of the technology we have means that if they can view it once, they can view it as long and as many times as they want. Anything trying to restrict that is just futile -- look at DRM.

Snapchat has never given that particular illusion of privacy. As the most common and basic example, it has absolutely no way of stopping people from simply taking a screenshot of your image. Snapchat is meant to be used to share throwaway photos without the social expectation that comes from putting it on somewhere like Facebook. Anyone who uses the application learns quickly that someone can potentially store the photo they sent -- in a vast variety of ways.

Comment · 12 years ago
In app purchases are fine, but be HONEST about it. Not being upfront about the costs of your game directly misleads the customer and, in my opinion, is a terrible and abusive way to earn revenue.
Comment · 12 years ago
This is great. Proper cryptography is the solution to so many of the problems the modern internet is facing right now, but the key problem with cryptography is that it is never user friendly enough and never distributed enough.

This looks like a great step in the right direction.

Comment · 13 years ago
I'm not an expert on this, but I believe that at the VM user level they would see wiped data because of the internal mapping. I think physical analysis of the drive would be required.
Comment · 13 years ago
The term "disc scrub" makes little to no sense in terms of SSDs, which makes this issue even more complicated. People who work in the disc recovery field have been dealing with this since SSDs became popular.

An SSD is limited by its number of writes. To compensate for this, the SSD has very complicated on board logic that abstracts the actual SSD away from what it tells the OS system. This allows it to do certain tricks to save writes. However, when you are "scrubbing" an SSD, internally the SSD might be writing somewhere else entirely. Scrubbing is not considered an effective way of wiping SSDs, from what I believe.

Comment · 13 years ago
VERY interesting, thanks for sharing! I'll have to play around with this a bit...
Comment · 13 years ago
I imagine it assumes a header like X-Requested-By has not been manipulated. You can safely assume that the referrer, or other headers, have not been manipulated. There is no way for malicious Javascript running in the users browser to edit headers.

Of course, anyone can code their own browser to lie about headers. It doesn't make much sense to specifically open yourself to vulnerabilities though.

Comment · 13 years ago
Comment · 13 years ago
Unfortunately, this is what happens to online communities. Particularly those run by teenagers. I've been a member of a number of communities that have suffered deaths in very similar ways -- choked by the people who own the rights at the expense of the volunteers and the community.

It's unfortunate, because I find that often volunteer teenagers are the ones that truly have a passion for doing what they are doing, but they get held up by corporations or by people who want to monetize. When that doesn't work, the people in charge ignore the community until it dies.

It's sad to see it happen to another community.

Comment · 13 years ago
Hehe, when I started reading I was very appreciative of the fact I was prewarned by the "DESIGN CONCEPT" lettering.
Comment · 13 years ago
I think it's important to keep this in context, especially for Snapchat. Snapchat is an app. Their website contains almost nothing. I bet a VERY small percentage of people who use Snapchat have ever seen their website, much less google'd the term.
Comment · 13 years ago
After the preauth, you're required to take it out before you can start pumping.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton