SparkyMcUnicorn

It takes a small effort up front to pick out some freeleech content and/or set up autobrr, then you pretty much never have to worry about ratio ever again.

I think the biggest selling point of a codex sub vs a claude sub is that you can use codex subs in any harness you want.

It's almost comical how annoying it is. I just want to try it.

I still think the only reason to use jQuery is if you need IE11 support.

Otherwise, it's really simple to do all the things you mentioned without the complexity/heaviness of jQuery. Something like this:

``` const $ = s => { const r = {}; const els = [...document.querySelectorAll(s)]; r.text = t => (els.forEach(e => e.textContent = t), r); r.on = (ev, fn) => (els.forEach(e => e.addEventListener(ev, fn)), r); // ... return r; }; ```

Closed source, solves a different problem, and just looks like generic agent sandboxes/VMs?

What am I missing.

I run into this several times per week.

Sometimes the context where Fable drops to Opus 4.8 is enough for Opus 4.8 to do a first pass on everything, then I start a new session and Fable will happily refactor/improve it.

Super annoying.

If active weight bandwidth is everything, then wouldn't Qwen 35b a3b (FP8) be roughly half the cost of dsv4f (FP4)?

dsv4f appears bigger and more memory/computationally expensive to run any way I look at it.

16 MHz is the chip's clock speed. Arduino PID is more like 100 Hz to 1 kHz.

Human deliberate movement runs around 2-10 Hz I think.

If you use Claude Code, there are plenty of projects/tools that let you see what your usage would have cost at API rates, then you can cross-reference that to your "usage" in Claude. I run through enough token in a few days for the subscription to pay for itself.

But I agree that advertised visibility into this would be nice, so we could compare the different providers up-front.