Snitch-Thursday
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
I agree with that guideline. I don't want HN in general to devolve into standard tribal mudslinging.
But I don't believe this is the standard 'breaking news' chum of the day, mostly because of the reputation of the author, though I readily admit the sensationalist title is click-baity.
So far (7 hours after this was first posted) most comments seem to be complaining that the HN users can't flag this away. I found the story interesting, it makes you think about just what the USGov is doing, if it's true or not is somewhat immaterial...the story was an interesting read, whether it was a non-fiction story or not.
I'm trying to decide whether to purchase "Tiny Habits" and the blurb on the seller's page is nice, but somewhat generic.
Having said that...I'm not diagnosed as ADHD but I definitely feel I exhibit executive dysfunction symptoms, and one of my siblings was diagnosed, so I'm feeling confident I'm ADHD adjacent at least...and just trying to implement Getting Things Done helped me immensely. Not only does it help with having a less stressful day (no longer do I have "what am I missing? what am I forgetting? Ahhh, angst!" feelings), it also helps me to just stay on task and/or when I switch tasks, know that I have the confidence to come back to wherever I was.
That wikipedia page has a support table saying IOS supports PWAs as YES and Firefox as NO is odd considering Apple requires Mozilla to ship a crippled form of safari on IOS, if Firefox could ship their own true application, I suspect they would have better PWA support as a differentiator with Safari.
[1] https://thenewstack.io/owa-takes-on-apples-browser-ban-for-p...
[2] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Progressive_web...
It's the age old 'control of technology vs convenience of content authoring'.
What I don't understand is...how do I get a PDF / talk authors who take this path into making one?
When the book was being authored, the True Blue subscribers could get a PDF when the book was done.
Can I do that now? If I pay $300, do I get a PDF still? Or has that opportunity passed, and in order to have an offline copy, do I need to subscribe and scrape all the content for my personal archive?
Like TFA states, one day Mr. Sinofsky can decide to download his zip and close up shop, what happens to the rest of us who subscribed? Our interesting nerd / business running / retro windows insider war stories archive goes poof.
I like this information. I want to 'own' it forever if only to review it and learn its lessons over and over during my career. I don't want to make unauthorized copies, but I can't actually buy this, I can only rent it, and that's a bummer.
So. I'm not subscribing nor am I scraping it. I just look at it regretfully from the distance of a free viewer.
Edit: less flamey mode
Kudos to WM for keeping the option for that theme in MediaWiki. Now I have a reason to browse logged in all the time.
Private offices on a spoke with a collab/whiteboard room for a hub are the most tempting form of office space to me, but that still presumes that
1) my entire team is in one location. If we are going to have at least 2 people remotely, in order to not treat them as second class citizens, we all should be remote and only use remote-capable tools, which kills whiteboards
2) my commute is not crazy. It's really, really hard to compete with zero commute at all every single day. Nothing more convenient than doing the quick laundry / lunch prep / seeing family tasks
Coming back to the ~~bullpen~~ collaborative open plan office where we have nothing but L desks and nerf guns is not that tempting to me.
If a customer has never used kubernetes and just wants to run a few containers from you, I would consider handing them a docker compose file instead.
I choose to be stuck with OneNote 2010 because:
1. It has local files I can back up and sync, no cloud account or online requirement (also more privacy from cloud scanning)
1. It supports embedding files so I can back up the notebooks and not have to go find every file scattered all throughout my hard drive in order to make those up two
1. I can hand write and have text be searched or OCRed
1. It has embedding support for images and audio and have them be interactive (you can see the image, play the video, listen to the sound right in the program)
Writing such a program is a very difficult problem. If it were easy, we would be having all of these features and not just another round of markdown text file editors.
Xournal++ is considering moving to a file format that would enable you to embed files that would be zipped up as part of the file format, since it already supports handwriting recognition and has basic text and good enough image display, I continued to watch it to see if it can take over my onenote use cases, but it's just not there yet.