SideburnsOfDoom

Joined 15 years ago

Karma
10,513
Submissions
5,983
Member since
Nov 19
Coder in London
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 day ago
Proton have been in the news in the last 2 days, bad executive behaviour to the extent that and some see signs of AI psychosis.

e.g.

https://www.404media.co/manifestos-fear-and-loser-thinking-i...

https://www.gadgetreview.com/ai-or-unemployment-proton-is-re...

I started to be wary when they got into Cryptocurrency https://proton.me/blog/proton-wallet-launch

For Proton Mail specifically, they are now pushing AI features, e.g. https://proton.me/blog/proton-scribe-writing-assistant.

The 404 media link is in a comment unthread, reading it does give me the impression that I should avoid the company.

Comment · 3 days ago
The other issue is that in an election like the US, the results in different states are not independent, decoupled rolls of the dice. i.e. If the results of the first few states lean a few % one way off the polling (within the margin of error) then it's most likely that most of the other states will doe the same.
Comment · 3 days ago
1-2 I urge you to read the other comments in this thread that make the same points in other terms.

3 Still not clear if you possess it either.

4 So you're already solved this, and not at all in the way that you're advocating for? That's revealing.

Your responses are myopic, juvenile and add no understanding, so I am at this point going to say: good bye and have a nice day.

Comment · 4 days ago
1. Meta are an obvious influence factory. Of course they say otherwise in court, but it's well known and not subtle.

2. I was being generous.

3. "Some could argue that you are the opposite of complicit", and they'd be wrong. "If you work at a company that does bad things and" let me stop you there at the "and". Your real job (the stuff before the "and") isn't negated by your hobby, and if they're severely at odds then your work effectiveness will suffer.

4. How did that work out for you?

Comment · 4 days ago
Comment · 4 days ago
The odds of you, the non-warmonger, influencing your employer's business direction are close to nil. You becoming complicit is a certainly.

The change is not "objectively worse" - it is the same for them and is definitely better for you. This is a pointless take.

Many other comments here expand on these themes - you're not going to influence the company direction by staying. You should not be surprised when the armaments factory makes bombs, or the influence factory makes political influence.

Comment · 5 days ago
Armaments factory employees denounce bombs.
Comment · 10 days ago
In actual reality "Joe Biden was a career politician because he'd say..." does not in any way contradict "Joe Biden did x and engaged in more y..." Outcomes matter, regardless of motives. Do you see the difference?

The rest is changing the subject - derailing and inflammatory.

Comment · 10 days ago
Comment · 11 days ago
Comment · 11 days ago
> it's a bit of a conspiracy theorist

FYI, the account that you are replying to has promoted a range of conspiracy theories - 1) Pro Russia, 2) antisemitic (of course), and 3) Were Dinosaurs real? (yes, really!)

You'll have to show the dead flagged comments in order top see them, if you need to.

Comment · 12 days ago
> check the background of key people like Nuland, Kagan, Friedman, Blinken(stein). Where did they come from?

Could you perhaps say plainly whatever you are alluding to here? I'd like you to state your position clearly.

Comment · 14 days ago
Two subtleties in Frank Herbert's original formulation that are often missed:

The first has been covered: "Once men turned their thinking over to machine ... that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them." Men did the enslaving. It describes a techbro oligarch takeover, not an AI takeover. The machines do not have agency.

Hebert was really into the whole idea now expressed as "Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times." i.e. good times, people get lazy, then get weak, then get enslaved. (1)

And the second is that "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind" is not the same thing as "Though shalt not make a machine mind". A drawing or statue of a person is "in the likeness" of that person. It's not a person. It doesn't have to actually be the thing in order to qualify as "likeness" of it.

People who scorn LLMs would agree that they produce something like the output of a human, in the sense that a parody, a caricature, a cartoon is a likeness. An uncanny valley mockery of the thing is "in the likeness" of a thing.

Ultimately, Herbert put this in his fiction because he didn't want to write about robots or machines, just humans and human potential (2). So he wrote it out with a few paragraphs of backstory in the novels' distant past. You can over-interpret it. Herbert wanted to sound deep, but he did not always succeed. And even when he succeeded in that, his views were not always the best.

1) https://acoup.blog/2020/01/17/collections-the-fremen-mirage-...

2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_potential_movement

Comment · 14 days ago
Also don't undersell how wildly impractical this known technology is - it requires a skirt that in order to get close to the ground, which will abrade. It loses traction dangerously if the seal is broken, it's very loud and energy intensive. It sucks up dust, pebbles and other road debris and spits them out at other road users, and it takes up a lot of volume in the car. As do those thrusters.

This is a circus stunt.

Comment · 15 days ago
Agreed. Just think about it for a second. If it was 2 tons like a real EV, could a fan or 2 keep it adhered to a vertical surface?

This is a circus stunt.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton