SideburnsOfDoom
Joined 15 years ago
Joined 15 years ago
e.g.
https://www.404media.co/manifestos-fear-and-loser-thinking-i...
https://www.gadgetreview.com/ai-or-unemployment-proton-is-re...
I started to be wary when they got into Cryptocurrency https://proton.me/blog/proton-wallet-launch
For Proton Mail specifically, they are now pushing AI features, e.g. https://proton.me/blog/proton-scribe-writing-assistant.
The 404 media link is in a comment unthread, reading it does give me the impression that I should avoid the company.
3 Still not clear if you possess it either.
4 So you're already solved this, and not at all in the way that you're advocating for? That's revealing.
Your responses are myopic, juvenile and add no understanding, so I am at this point going to say: good bye and have a nice day.
2. I was being generous.
3. "Some could argue that you are the opposite of complicit", and they'd be wrong. "If you work at a company that does bad things and" let me stop you there at the "and". Your real job (the stuff before the "and") isn't negated by your hobby, and if they're severely at odds then your work effectiveness will suffer.
4. How did that work out for you?
e.g. "Across the Caribbean, people have installed roughly twice as many solar panels as official statistics would suggest. ... China ... has exported far more panels to the Caribbean than have officially been installed."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/science/articles/caribbean-nation...
The change is not "objectively worse" - it is the same for them and is definitely better for you. This is a pointless take.
Many other comments here expand on these themes - you're not going to influence the company direction by staying. You should not be surprised when the armaments factory makes bombs, or the influence factory makes political influence.
The rest is changing the subject - derailing and inflammatory.
FYI, yes they likely do want to argue. That's what they do https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50101690
It's trollish behaviour. You can't stop the pidgeon from playing Pidgeon Chess.
FYI, this refers to "Large boulder the size of a small boulder" in 2020
FYI, the account that you are replying to has promoted a range of conspiracy theories - 1) Pro Russia, 2) antisemitic (of course), and 3) Were Dinosaurs real? (yes, really!)
You'll have to show the dead flagged comments in order top see them, if you need to.
Could you perhaps say plainly whatever you are alluding to here? I'd like you to state your position clearly.
The first has been covered: "Once men turned their thinking over to machine ... that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them." Men did the enslaving. It describes a techbro oligarch takeover, not an AI takeover. The machines do not have agency.
Hebert was really into the whole idea now expressed as "Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times." i.e. good times, people get lazy, then get weak, then get enslaved. (1)
And the second is that "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind" is not the same thing as "Though shalt not make a machine mind". A drawing or statue of a person is "in the likeness" of that person. It's not a person. It doesn't have to actually be the thing in order to qualify as "likeness" of it.
People who scorn LLMs would agree that they produce something like the output of a human, in the sense that a parody, a caricature, a cartoon is a likeness. An uncanny valley mockery of the thing is "in the likeness" of a thing.
Ultimately, Herbert put this in his fiction because he didn't want to write about robots or machines, just humans and human potential (2). So he wrote it out with a few paragraphs of backstory in the novels' distant past. You can over-interpret it. Herbert wanted to sound deep, but he did not always succeed. And even when he succeeded in that, his views were not always the best.
1) https://acoup.blog/2020/01/17/collections-the-fremen-mirage-...
This is a circus stunt.
This is a circus stunt.