ShredKazoo
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
Gain of function research is supposed to help with pandemics, right? Did it help with COVID?
"Better" according to what metric?
It may be the case that there is a tendency for high-intelligence humans to pick "more enlightened" goals. Perhaps there is a natural "enlightened goals" attractor for our species.
However I don't think we can extrapolate from that to a fundamentally alien AI.
I think even if this statistical tendency exists, it has clear counterexamples -- consider that 2 genius chess players may have opposite goals, of beating one another. And we shouldn't bet the future of humanity on this statistical tendency extrapolating outside of the original distribution of human species.
Here are some intuition pumps on how diverse goals can be even across intelligent species:
* Orcas killing sharks for their livers: https://www.livescience.com/2-orcas-slaughter-19-sharks-in-a... I don't believe dolphins show the same level of violence, even though both are smart cetaceans
* Intelligent dogs bred to be responsive and attentive to human needs -- unlike close cousins like the wolf
* Chimpanzees and bonobos are both related to humans, both highly intelligent, but with very different culture and goals https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6Ko0Hzi47U
This has been discussed under "warning shots" https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/idipkijjz5PoxAwju/warning-sh...
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/7b9ZDTAYQY9k6FZHS/...
What's the most complex life which could conceivably exist in such a cold environment? Presumably there's very little sunlight penetrating through the ice to the liquid ocean.
My understanding is that opinion polls show most people have a moderate opinion on abortion, which seems pretty reasonable given that "becoming human" is something that happens in a continuous manner over a 9-month period.