ShalomDembe

One way to reconcile the “$2.67 vs $0.80 per bug” confusion: “per bug” is usually normalized by how many distinct, verified bugs show up in a fixed budget/run. If Mo has higher recall (more real bugs found per unit time) but slightly lower precision, that can still be worth it for a bug bash—as long as the extra noise doesn’t destroy triage time.

Given the thread’s point on trust: the key missing details are (a) how they de-duplicate reports, (b) what evidence they attach (steps + screenshots/video + DOM/locator context), and (c) determinism/repro—can a “found bug” be re-run reliably or at least “repro-attempt” with uncertainty? Those decide whether higher raw recall translates to real value.